Hi all,
Thanks for the votes! Since three complete business days have passed since
the opening of this thread, I'd like to conclude voting on KIP-507, which
has been accepted. The final results are:
For (binding): Randall, Rajini, and Ewen
For (non-binding): Konstantine
Against (binding): None
Ag
+1 (binding)
A couple of comments on the details:
- I think this might be the first time we're adding a new message type to
the config topic. Might be worth noting that (somewhat unfortunately) we
currently log unknown keys as an error. Kinda unclear whether it should be
an error or warn (since i
Nicely done!
+1 (non-binding)
Konstantine
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:10 AM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, Chris!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:12 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Chris!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019
Thanks for the KIP, Chris!
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Rajini
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:12 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
> Thanks, Chris!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:43 PM Chris Egerton wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to begin voting on KIP-507:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.or
Thanks, Chris!
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:43 PM Chris Egerton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to begin voting on KIP-507:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-507%3A+Securing+Internal+Connect+REST+Endpoints
>
> Thanks to Ryanne, Magesh, Konstantine, Greg, and Rand
Hi all,
I'd like to begin voting on KIP-507:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-507%3A+Securing+Internal+Connect+REST+Endpoints
Thanks to Ryanne, Magesh, Konstantine, Greg, and Randall for the fruitful
discussion!
Cheers,
Chris
