Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

Thanks, all. With binding +1 votes from Gwen Shapira, Manikumar Reddy, Mickael Maison, and M. Manna, and non-binding +1 votes from Ron Dagostino, Viktor Somogyi-Vass and David Jacot, the vote passes. best, Colin On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, at 10:59, David Jacot wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! David Le ven. 17 janv. 2020 à 19:25, Colin McCabe a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm going to close the vote later today. > > thanks, > Colin > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 06:34, M. Manna wrote: > > +1 (Binding) - a long awaited KIP to have a simpler partition >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

Hi all, I'm going to close the vote later today. thanks, Colin On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, at 06:34, M. Manna wrote: > +1 (Binding) - a long awaited KIP to have a simpler partition reassignment > script (without ZK)> > > Kudos to you Colin :) > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 10:10, Viktor Somogyi-Vass

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

+1 (Binding) - a long awaited KIP to have a simpler partition reassignment script (without ZK)> Kudos to you Colin :) On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 10:10, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Viktor > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:27 AM Manikumar > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

Thanks Colin +1 (binding) On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:27 AM Manikumar wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:48 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 (binding, re-vote) > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Colin McCabe wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

+1 (non-binding) Viktor On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:27 AM Manikumar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:48 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 (binding, re-vote) > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Colin McCabe > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP. On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:48 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 (binding, re-vote) > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Colin McCabe wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm reposting this since I've been informed that gmail mashed the > original VOTE thread into a

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

+1 (binding, re-vote) On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Colin McCabe wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm reposting this since I've been informed that gmail mashed the original > VOTE thread into a different email thread. Hopefully the different thread > title will prevent it doing that in this case. >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

Hi Colin. +1 from me (non-binding). (re-voting on this thread) Ron On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:23 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm reposting this since I've been informed that gmail mashed the original > VOTE thread into a different email thread. Hopefully the different thread >

[VOTE] KIP-555: An admin tools proposal to accomplish the deprecation of zookeeper access that is direct

Hi all, I'm reposting this since I've been informed that gmail mashed the original VOTE thread into a different email thread. Hopefully the different thread title will prevent it doing that in this case. I'd like to start the vote on KIP-555: Deprecate Direct Zookeeper access in Kafka