Hello,
I'm suspending the vote to continue the discussion in the related email
thread. Will resume the vote when that is completed.
Paolo
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 17:31, Ismael Juma wrote:
> I commented in the discussion thread. I think the rejected alternative of
> validating during topic creat
I commented in the discussion thread. I think the rejected alternative of
validating during topic creation seems better.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:17 AM Paolo Moriello
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to everybody who has given feedback. I've incorporated the
> suggestions and think that this is now r
+1 (non binding).
Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:43 PM Alexandre Dupriez <
alexandre.dupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding).
>
> Thanks.
>
> Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:24, M. Manna a écrit :
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP.
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:17, Paolo Mo
+1 (non binding).
Thanks.
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:24, M. Manna a écrit :
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:17, Paolo Moriello
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks to everybody who has given feedback. I've incorporated the
> > suggestions and think that th
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 14:17, Paolo Moriello
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to everybody who has given feedback. I've incorporated the
> suggestions and think that this is now ready for a vote.
>
> KIP 579:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
Hello,
Thanks to everybody who has given feedback. I've incorporated the
suggestions and think that this is now ready for a vote.
KIP 579:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-579%3A+new+exception+on+min.insync.replicas+%3E+replication.factor
PR:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/
