Thank you to all that voted. I have 4 binding votes and 4 non-binding votes. I
will begin work on this KIP soon.
Thanks,
Sanjana
On Mar 26, 2020, 3:03 PM -0700, Konstantine Karantasis
, wrote:
> Thank you Sanjana!
>
> +1 (binding) from me too.
>
> Konstantine
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:57 P
Thank you Sanjana!
+1 (binding) from me too.
Konstantine
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:57 PM Sanjana Kaundinya
wrote:
> Hi Konstantine,
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I have addressed it on the [DISCUSS] thread and
> will update the KIP shortly.
>
> Thanks,
> Sanjana
> On Mar 25, 2020, 10:52 AM -07
Hi Konstantine,
Thanks for the feedback, I have addressed it on the [DISCUSS] thread and will
update the KIP shortly.
Thanks,
Sanjana
On Mar 25, 2020, 10:52 AM -0700, Konstantine Karantasis
, wrote:
> Hi Sanjana.
> Thanks for the KIP! Seems quite useful not to overwhelm the brokers with
> the d
Hi Sanjana.
Thanks for the KIP! Seems quite useful not to overwhelm the brokers with
the described requests from clients.
You have the votes already, and I'm also in favor overall, but I've made a
couple of questions (sorry for the delay) regarding Connect, which is also
using retry.backoff.ms but
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP, great improvement!
Le mer. 25 mars 2020 à 04:44, Gwen Shapira a écrit :
> +1 (binding) - thank you
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020, 10:50 AM Sanjana Kaundinya
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I’d like to start a vote for KIP-580: Exponential Backoff for Kafka
>
+1 (binding) - thank you
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020, 10:50 AM Sanjana Kaundinya
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for KIP-580: Exponential Backoff for Kafka
> Clients. The link to the KIP can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-580%3A+Exponential+Bac
+1 Thanks for the KIP!
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:31 AM Boyang Chen
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> agree with Guozhang for the warning.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:57 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > One minor thing is that upon starting, when we find the specified
> > `max
+1 (non-binding).
agree with Guozhang for the warning.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:57 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> One minor thing is that upon starting, when we find the specified
> `max.backoff` config < `backoff`, we can log a warning message.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Tue, Mar 24,
+1 (binding).
One minor thing is that upon starting, when we find the specified
`max.backoff` config < `backoff`, we can log a warning message.
Guozhang
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:22 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:20 PM Sanjana Kaundinya
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for KIP-580: Exponential Backoff for Kafka
> Clients. The link to the KIP can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-580%3A+
Hi Everyone,
I’d like to start a vote for KIP-580: Exponential Backoff for Kafka Clients.
The link to the KIP can be found here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-580%3A+Exponential+Backoff+for+Kafka+Clients.
Thanks,
Sanjana
11 matches
Mail list logo
