Thank you all. I will update the confluence pages with the status
and raise the PR once it is ready.
-Gokul
On 10-09-2020 03:22, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
+1 from me as well (non-binding)
Gokul, it looks you've now received enough binding votes and the vote has
been
open for sufficiently
+1 from me as well (non-binding)
Gokul, it looks you've now received enough binding votes and the vote has
been
open for sufficiently long. You can conclude the vote and open the PR for
review
when it's ready
Cheers,
Sophie
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1. Thanks for
+1. Thanks for the KIP Gokul !
Guozhang
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:52 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 9/8/20 2:49 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > +1 Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to call a
+1 (binding)
On 9/8/20 2:49 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
>>
>> *KIP *-
>>
>>
+1 Thanks for the KIP!
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
>
> *KIP *-
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> <
>
Hi,
I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
*KIP *-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
