Just updated the wiki to clarify that.
Thanks everyone for the votes. KIP-92 has passed with +3 (binding) and +2
(non-binding).
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> That seems reasonable. It would be good to update the KIP to make this
> clear.
>
> Ismael
>
That seems reasonable. It would be good to update the KIP to make this
clear.
Ismael
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> Thanks for the comments. Good observation. I guess for max lag of all the
> partitions the average value is less
Hi Ismael,
Thanks for the comments. Good observation. I guess for max lag of all the
partitions the average value is less meaningful because the lag can be from
different partitions, so an average of lags from different partitions at
different times seems hard to reason about. On the other hand,
Thanks for the KIP, it's a useful improvement. Just one question, the KIP
states that it's about adding per partition metrics for metrics that
already exist. However, when I look at the code, it seems that
`records-lag-avg` doesn't exist?
this.recordsFetchLag = metrics.sensor("records-lag");
+1, thanks.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, radai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Becket Qin
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
>
+1
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, radai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Becket Qin
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I
+1
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to start a voting thread on KIP-92 which proposes to add per
> > partition lag metrics to
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start a voting thread on KIP-92 which proposes to add per
> partition lag metrics to KafkaConsumer. The KIP wiki page is below:
>
>
Hi,
I want to start a voting thread on KIP-92 which proposes to add per
partition lag metrics to KafkaConsumer. The KIP wiki page is below:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-92+-+Add+per+partition+lag+metrics+to+KafkaConsumer
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin