[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14122070#comment-14122070
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-1043:
--
Moving to 0.9.
Time-consuming FetchRequest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13771981#comment-13771981
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-1043:
--
IMHO the local time processing the fetch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13771994#comment-13771994
]
Neha Narkhede commented on KAFKA-1043:
--
As Sriram said, we no longer block on a full
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13771528#comment-13771528
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-1043:
--
Giving it some more thought, I think a long
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13771557#comment-13771557
]
Jay Kreps commented on KAFKA-1043:
--
Why not just configure the socket buffer size based
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13771574#comment-13771574
]
Sriram Subramanian commented on KAFKA-1043:
---
We no longer block on the socket