We should consider deprecating the scala API so scala version doesn't even
matter anymore for folks... we could even pin the broker to a specific
Scala version too
Of course this makes sense for the Java produce but maybe not just yet for
the consumer, maybe 0.9.0.
Not having to build in 0.8.
+1
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1.
>
> Scala 2.9 has been 4 years old and I think it is time to drop it.
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
>
> > +1 for dropping 2.9
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sriharsha Chintalapani
> > wrote:
> >
> >
+1.
Scala 2.9 has been 4 years old and I think it is time to drop it.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
> +1 for dropping 2.9
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sriharsha Chintalapani
> wrote:
>
> > I am +1 on dropping 2.9.x support.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> >
> > On
I am +1 on dropping 2.9.x support.
Thanks,
Harsha
On July 8, 2015 at 7:08:12 AM, Ismael Juma (mli...@juma.me.uk) wrote:
Hi,
The responses in this thread were positive, but there weren't many. A few
months passed and Sriharsha encouraged me to reopen the thread given that
the 2.9 build h
+1 for dropping 2.9
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sriharsha Chintalapani
wrote:
> I am +1 on dropping 2.9.x support.
>
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
>
> On July 8, 2015 at 7:08:12 AM, Ismael Juma (mli...@juma.me.uk) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The responses in this thread were positive, but there weren't many.
Hi,
The responses in this thread were positive, but there weren't many. A few
months passed and Sriharsha encouraged me to reopen the thread given that
the 2.9 build has been broken for at least a week[1] and no-one seemed to
notice.
Do we want to invest more time so that the 2.9 build continues
+1. But can we also look at this from the deployment base point view and
find out how many production deployments are still using 2.9? If there is
not any, dropping it is really an easy decision.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The K
+1 for dropping 2.9.x support
Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Kafka build currently includes support for Scala 2.9, which means that
> it cannot take advantage of features introduced in Scala 2.10 or depend on
> libraries that re
Hi all,
The Kafka build currently includes support for Scala 2.9, which means that
it cannot take advantage of features introduced in Scala 2.10 or depend on
libraries that require it.
This restricts the solutions available while trying to solve existing
issues. I was browsing JIRA looking for ar
