Re: KIP process

Thanks Divij. I will start creating KIP offline for now and share it with you when ready. On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 22:23 Divij Vaidya wrote: > cc: PMC > > Hey Arpit > > We are currently facing a problem with adding new users to the confluence > wiki which Apache Kafka uses to maintain KIPs. We are

Re: KIP process

cc: PMC Hey Arpit We are currently facing a problem with adding new users to the confluence wiki which Apache Kafka uses to maintain KIPs. We are working with Apache Infrastructure on a resolution - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25451 If this is blocking you, we have two options.

Re: KIP process

+ @Kamal Chandraprakash @Vaidya, Divij Can you help me setting up the wiki id for the confluence. Thanks and Regards Arpit Goyal 8861094754 On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 9:27 PM Arpit Goyal wrote: > Hi Team, > I want to start contributing to KIP but I am unable to login with the jira >

KIP process

Hi Team, I want to start contributing to KIP but I am unable to login with the jira credentials. Can somebody help with the process? Jira userid is : goyarpit. [image: Screenshot 2024-03-07 at 9.27.03 PM.png] Thanks and Regards Arpit Goyal 8861094754

Re: KIP Process Needs Improvement

Hello, Knowles. I have some frustration with KIP process, also. Some features, that at glance requested by the community just can’t be done without explicit commiters approval. KIP-729 [1], KIP-686 [2], request the same feature, can be taken as a good example. Dear Kafka committers, what kind

Re: KIP Process Needs Improvement

Good morning Knowles, Thank you for sharing this feedback. I think your frustration is well founded. I think most/all of the active committers carry around a sense of guilt about KIPs that we haven’t been able to review. We do have a responsibility to hold auditable, public design discussions

KIP Process Needs Improvement

Good morning, The current process of KIPs needs to be improved. There are at least a handful of open KIPs with existing PRs that are in a purgatory state. I understand that people are busy, but if you are going to gatekeep Kafka with this process, then it must be responsive. Even if the community

Re: Using KIP Process in Apache Flink

I'm very curious how the process will work for your community. If you will be able to drop by with feedback in few month, I will greatly appreciate. Processes can always be improved and a fresh set of eyes on the KIP process can be useful Gwen On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Aljoscha Krettek

Re: Using KIP Process in Apache Flink

Thanks, appreciate it! :-) On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 at 17:21 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Aljoscha, > > Thanks for sharing your intention to use a process similar to our KIP > process. You are more than welcome to copy the structures and docs that we > hav

Re: Using KIP Process in Apache Flink

Hi Aljoscha, Thanks for sharing your intention to use a process similar to our KIP process. You are more than welcome to copy the structures and docs that we have for the KIP process. :) Ismael On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Kafka

Using KIP Process in Apache Flink

Hi Kafka Community, I'm a member of the Flink community and I would like to ask if you're okay with us using your KIP process for Flink. We are at a stage where we have to be more careful in planning big feature additions to Flink and are looking for ways to formalize our processes there. I feel

KIP process

Hi, I just read through the KIP process[1] and have three specific questions: 1. I notice that the voting is executed using "Lazy Majority"[2]. However, I was surprised that "Lazy Majority" doesn't stipulate a time for how long a voting process will go on. I