RE: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC0

Sure, many thanks for looking at it SimonC -Original Message- From: Gwen Shapira [mailto:g...@confluent.io] Sent: 28 March 2016 22:30 To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC0 Since Dana and few others found critical issues for the release, I've rolled out another RC

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC0

Since Dana and few others found critical issues for the release, I've rolled out another RC. I'll send the vote thread in a second. Simon, since KAFKA-3296 doesn't have a solution yet, I could not include it in the release candidate. We can roll out another RC if we find a solution, or we can

RE: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC0

I would like KAFKA-3296 to be looked at for 0.10, this is causing us significant issues in our testing. There's a comment in the bug that this is possibly caused by KAFKA-3215, but that was fixed in 0.9, and KAFKA-3296 is reproducible in 0.9, so it could be a regression. SimonC -Original

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC0

Thank you! The affected version should be 0.10.0.0 fixVersion will be 0.10.0.0 if you think its a show-stopper for the release (in this case, make it a blocker too). If its not a blocker, fixVersion can be either left empty or set to 0.10.1.0 Gwen On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Dana Powers

Re: [VOTE] 0.10.0.0 RC0

I filed a bug re max.partition.fetch.bytes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3442 Would it be useful to create a 0.10.0.0-rc0 version for JIRA tickets? Or should issues just get filed against 0.10.0.0 ? -Dana On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Gwen Shapira