t;
>
>
> From: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM
> To: dev
> Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
> Subject:[VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups API
>
>
> I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
> Therefore, I'd like to start
KIP-231 is approved with 3 "+1" binding votes by Ewen, Jason, and Harsha.
Thanks to everyone who provided feedback and/or voted.
Regards.
--Vahid
From: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM
To: dev
Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Re
/IBM
> To: dev < dev@kafka.apache.org >
> Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups API
>
>
> I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
> Therefore, I'd like to start a vote.
>
> htt
Bump!
From: "Vahid S Hashemian"
To: dev
Date: 06/01/2018 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
API
I'm bumping this vote thread up as the KIP requires only one binding +1 to
pass.
The KIP is very similar in nature to th
' minimum required
permissions more consistent.
Thanks.
--Vahid
From: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM
To: dev
Date: 12/19/2017 11:30 AM
Subject:[VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups API
I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far
01/23/2018 08:27 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
API
+1. It's a little odd that we are still left with the anomalous cluster
permission for ListGroups. You mention in the rejected alternatives that
reducing permissions would make it impossible for
> From: Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 01/02/2018 09:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
> API
>
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP Vahid, nice impro
And this one requires two more binding +1's :)
Thanks.
From: Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: 01/02/2018 09:50 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-231: Improve the Required ACL of ListGroups
API
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP Vahid
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP Vahid, nice improvement!
-Ewen
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
> Therefore, I'd like to start a vote.
>
>
I believe the concerns on this KIP have been addressed so far.
Therefore, I'd like to start a vote.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-231%3A+Improve+the+Required+ACL+of+ListGroups+API
Thanks.
--Vahid
10 matches
Mail list logo
