Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

Hi Dan, the fix version is 3.1.0, that's why it doesn't include in 2.2.3. I add the 2.2.4 as a target fix version. Regards JB On 08/30/2011 08:26 AM, Dan Tran wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-541 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Dan, coul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-541 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Dan, > > could you remember me the Jira ? > I'm afraid to have forgotten it :/ > > I will fix it for 2.2.4 for sure. > > My apologies > Regards > JB > > On 08/29/2011 11:33 PM, Dan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

Hi Dan, could you remember me the Jira ? I'm afraid to have forgotten it :/ I will fix it for 2.2.4 for sure. My apologies Regards JB On 08/29/2011 11:33 PM, Dan Tran wrote: any chance to get secured jmx support for 2.2.x, JB promised to to take a look for 2.2.3, but it seems he forgot about

Re: svn commit: r1162476 - /karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/assemblies/apache-karaf/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/jre.properties

Hi, This commit[1] also do same for JDK1.7. I'd say other JDK API are quite stable but javax.annotation is a little bit different so several other bundles(such as activemq, you can get more details from [2]) which are popularly used in KARAF are explicitly specify javax.annotation import ve

Re: svn commit: r1162476 - /karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/assemblies/apache-karaf/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/jre.properties

I'm a little bit curious because none of the other exported packages has a version; I'm basically not against adding versions here, but shouldn't we do the same for 1.5 and 1.7? Is there any way we can easily lookup which versions are used by which JRE? Kind regards, Andreas On Sun, Aug 28, 2011

Re: [PROPOSAL] Karaf trunk using JDK 1.6 and 1.7 on Jenkins

+1; same reasons as Achim here. Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 14:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > we added the Java 7 support for Karaf 2.2.3 and Karaf 3.0.0. I performed a > bunch of tests using Java 7 without problem on both trunk and karaf-2.2.x > branch. > > I t

Re: svn commit: r1162137 - in /karaf/sandbox/pieber/karaf-webconsole/trunk: ./ servicemix/ servicemix/src/ servicemix/src/main/ servicemix/src/main/java/ servicemix/src/main/java/org/ servicemix/src/m

What should I do to reproduce this problem? I'm curious if it is osgi, pax-wicket or something else that scala does not work here? On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 17:17, wrote: > Author: ldywicki > Date: Fri Aug 26 15:17:36 2011 > New Revision: 1162137 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162137&v

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

any chance to get secured jmx support for 2.2.x, JB promised to to take a look for 2.2.3, but it seems he forgot about it -D On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > Thanks Glen. We are continuing with this vote as we've updated the > online version of the release notes, and inclusion

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

Thanks Glen. We are continuing with this vote as we've updated the online version of the release notes, and inclusion of these two line items in the change log should not greatly affect end users. Cheers, Jamie On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: > If I understand correctly releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

If I understand correctly releases can't be vetoed ([1], search on "Releases may not be vetoed"). The release manager just needs 3 +1's and then it's his/her choice whether or not to release. Glen [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html On 08/29/2011 10:37 AM, Jamie G. wrote: Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

just my 2 cents here, though I haven't tested yet ;) JB and Ioannis are right this shouldn't keep us from releasing. regards, Achim 2011/8/29 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi Ioannis, > > you are right, I updated a bunch of Jira to the correct target versions, but > I forgot this one. > We need to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

Hi Ioannis, you are right, I updated a bunch of Jira to the correct target versions, but I forgot this one. We need to be careful with the fix version/affected version attributes. Anyway, I don't think that we have to cancel the release for that. Regards JB On 08/29/2011 05:49 PM, Ioannis Ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

No, I don't consider it a blocker. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * http://iocanel.blogspot.com Apache Karaf Committer & PMC Apache ServiceMix Committer Apache Gora Committer *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

I've updated the online release notes for 2.2.3. If we want to update the release notes in kit then I'll have to re-cut this RC. Do we consider this issue to be a blocker? On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > Haven't tested the release yet, but I have some comment to make r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

Haven't tested the release yet, but I have some comment to make regarding the release notes: Issues KARAF-776 and KARAF-807 are cellar issues which have wrong fix version (2.2.3 & 3.0.0 instead of cellar-2.2.3 & cellar-3.0.0). We may want to remove them from the release notes in order to avoid con

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

+1 Tested with Cave, Cellar, BuildEraser, and some others projects. Thanks Regards JB On 08/29/2011 04:37 PM, Jamie G. wrote: Hi, We resolved 51 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/commu

[VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.2.3

Hi, We resolved 51 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.3-release.page Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-071/

[Webconsole] Refactor of ConsoleTab

Hey guys, I wish notify you that I going to change a bit ConsoleTab and NavigationPanel. Currently all links are generated in core in NavigationPanel. We have number of problems with this - first of all we are unable to handle internationalization correctly. Second thing is customization of link