Hi
I second Guillaume here, even that a .sh isn't really required I think it's
a
"good practice" for all those windows users out there ;)
to not get confused and might be interested in running it with cygwin :)
Regards, Achim
2011/11/30 Guillaume Nodet
> Originally, the distribution did not
Originally, the distribution did not contain both unix and windows
files (there are 2 different distributions in 2.x), but given we now
have a single distribution containing both files, it seems to me a bit
more homogeneous to have ".bat" for windows batches and ".sh" for unix
scripts.
So I'm *slig
Hi Andres,
My comments:
1/ the windows script as .bat extension because it's a requirement on
Windows
2/ the important thing is the header (#!/bin/sh) in the unix script more
than the extension.
3/ it's really important, for portability, to use /bin/sh (which allow
us to use with bash, zsh on
I personally think that is a bad reasoning, there shouldn't be too many times
that editor support really is that necessary….. But… :)
As far as we are concerned it is an executable file i.e mod 755
for the distribution.
/je
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I
Hey guys,
I want to start a discussion about this JIRA here on the dev list: TBH I'm
personally quite indifferent but if we want to change this we should do it
now for 3.0 or otherwise it wont happen for quite a long time (till 4.0).
So, WDYT?
Kind regards,
Andreas
-- Forwarded message
-# (hyphen + pound sign) perhaps:
http://scalate.fusesource.org/documentation/scaml-reference.html#Scaml_Comments:__code_-___code_
?
Glen
On 11/29/2011 04:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I don't see any apache license headers in the manual .conf files. I think we have to fix
this ASAP or remov
I don't see any apache license headers in the manual .conf files. I think we
have to fix this ASAP or remove the manual. Does anyone know how to make a
"comment" in scalate so we can do this?
thanks
david jencks
