Hi Guillaume,
If we agree that we have a single distribution (which I don't like as a
pure Unix people ;)), I have no problem to rename it.
We just have to update dependant scripts (in admin, start, stop, etc).
Regards
JB
On 11/30/2011 08:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Originally, the
I'm more -1 to it. It really is against normal unix conventions to do it.
A user shouldn't need to know if an executable is a shell script, a perl
script, python, executable, etc... That's all that the .sh really does.
I just checked my /usr/bin directory and 560 of the 2758 executables
Well, I'd object tomcat does the same, and afaik, I've never heard it
was a problem.
I think not having the suffix .sh is fine when you only have unix
binaries. If you mix both in the same distribution, having different
extensions makes things more intuitive / homogeneous imho
On Wed, Nov 30,
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:17:46 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Well, I'd object tomcat does the same, and afaik, I've never heard it
was a problem.
I think not having the suffix .sh is fine when you only have unix
binaries. If you mix both in the same distribution, having different
FWIW I like it the way it is, I'm very used to unix scripts not having a .sh,
I'd vote -1 also.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 30, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'm more -1 to it. It really is against normal unix conventions to do it.
A user shouldn't need to know if an executable
Why does cygwin require a .sh extension ?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 16:21, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com wrote:
another thing here, with the .sh files you also are able to run it with
cygwin tools for windows. :)
For all those poor guys having to use windows and still want to be able to
I really like this idea. This would (in addition) also change another
problem discussed a time ago about setting karaf.home and karaf.data via
the Main method. Therefore +1. I don't think that I find any time for this,
but tbh I don't consider it critical. This is only an karaf-internal
I would assume that it only needs it for associating sh extention with
cygwin. But I can't know for sure, I haven't used a directx container for a
while :-P
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource http://fusesource.com
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/
cygwin doesn't but it helps associating it in windows for beeing executable
with a cygwin bash from the file-explorer :)
2011/11/30 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com
Why does cygwin require a .sh extension ?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 16:21, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
+1, well I think we've no other choice anyhow :-)
On Nov 30, 2011 9:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Commented) (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Hi all,
Our Karaf board report is due for December 2011.
I created it here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports
Please review it and update it if I forgot something.
The deadline is the 21st of December.
We have to send it one week before.
So I will send it on
Hi JB,
+1, looks good to me :)
regards, Achim
2011/12/1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net
Hi all,
Our Karaf board report is due for December 2011.
I created it here:
12 matches
Mail list logo
