Re: Proposal for pax url aether config

You have to be a little more careful testing this. As I said, although startup.properties contains mvn urls, they are not interpreted using the aether url handler, there's some code that directly finds the files in the system repo. So anything in startup.properties won't be copied into the loca

Re: Number of Karaf 3.0.0 issues

I believe we already have 3.0.1 in jira versions. I agree, lets move as much as possible to 3.0.1, and 3.1.0 then move things back as required. Cheers, Jamie On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I'm gonna create a 3.0.1 version also. > > We can move is

Re: [DISCUSSION] Scheduling of the Apache Karaf 2.2.6 Release Candidate for after Karaf 3.0.x branch creation.

As discussed together, this timing looks good to me ;) Regards JB On 03/07/2012 02:11 PM, Jamie G. wrote: Hi All, It's been several weeks since our last Apache Karaf 2.2.x patch update, as such I'd like to schedule in a Karaf 2.2.6 RC build. As the current focus of the community is on branchin

[DISCUSSION] Scheduling of the Apache Karaf 2.2.6 Release Candidate for after Karaf 3.0.x branch creation.

Hi All, It's been several weeks since our last Apache Karaf 2.2.x patch update, as such I'd like to schedule in a Karaf 2.2.6 RC build. As the current focus of the community is on branching Karaf 3.0.x from trunk, I'd like to tentatively schedule a 2.2.6 RC for after the 3.0.x branch's creation. W

Re: Number of Karaf 3.0.0 issues

Hi Christian, I'm gonna create a 3.0.1 version also. We can move issues to 3.0.1 or 3.1.0 depending of the criticity of the issues or the emergency. I started to review the Jira. Regards JB On 03/07/2012 01:45 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: Hi All, we currently have a very high number of

Number of Karaf 3.0.0 issues

Hi All, we currently have a very high number of issues (95) for Karaf 3.0.0. If it stays that high I can not imagine that we get out a Karaf 3 anytime soon. So please could everyone move issues that are not critical to be solved in 3.0.0 to 3.1.0? If no one objects I will start moving issues

Re: Proposal for pax url aether config

I was quite surprised with the latest David's e-mail, and quite sceptic regarding the pax-url-aether code. So I decided to make a test. I removed all Karaf artifact from my .m2/repository: rm -fr ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/karaf In a fresh Karaf trunk build, I can see the Karaf artifact in t