+1 for 3.0.0. For a start I like it as it is right now :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> +1, since we already had and still have so much un-discussed changes
> in the past
>
> 2012/8/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>> +1, we should be able to make
We spent one year before releasing 3.x. With this velocity we'll support OSGi 5
in same time as Java will support Jigsaw.
IMHO Karaf 4 is too far to plan anything in it, especially that Equinox and
Felix will be OSGi 5 compatible in more or less half year, I guess.
Best regards,
Lukasz
Wiadomo
Please keep in mind that Cellar is more specific to Karaf than Web Console is.
People can run Web Console on single node, for development purposes and so on.
I won't say that Cellar is only for Karaf, but it's mostly used with Karaf.
Going further Karaf can be one from platforms supported by Web
IMHO we don't need to include the same amount of features for 4.0 as
we did for 3.0 and I neither see any problem releasing Karaf 4 in 6-10
month...
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> We spent one year before releasing 3.x. With this velocity we'll sup
All,
As someone who has to help organizations migrate and define adoption plans I
much prefer the plan outlined by Andreas. Creating a break in backwards
compatibility in a minor release causes a loss of faith in enterprise
organizations. That faith is hard to rebuild later on without a compell
+1 for Andreas's first plan.
Freeman
－
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
On 2012-8-18, at 下午1:19, Andreas Pieber w
