Hi,
we also wait some update from Aries, and a fix on itests.
I'm working on it.
Regards
JB
On 09/25/2012 05:50 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Karaf 2.3.0 Release Candidate is soon approaching. We've so
far fixed 188 problems/updates/enhancements/new features on the branch
(awesome job e
Hi,
The Apache Karaf 2.3.0 Release Candidate is soon approaching. We've so
far fixed 188 problems/updates/enhancements/new features on the branch
(awesome job everyone!).
There now remains a few outstanding issues which are currently being
addressed. There are also two other apache releases in vo
And do you connect through ssh, and on which platform are you running the
client and server ?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which Karaf version ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/25/2012 03:26 PM, sekaijin wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Karaf console does not display c
Also which Windows version? :)
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which Karaf version ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/25/2012 03:26 PM, sekaijin wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> Karaf console does not display characters correctly é è à... chars.
>>
>>
>>
>> displayed:
>
Hi,
Which Karaf version ?
Regards
JB
On 09/25/2012 03:26 PM, sekaijin wrote:
Hello,
Karaf console does not display characters correctly é è à... chars.
displayed:
this comes from the evil charset defined System.defaultCharset() is cp1252
but the DOS console is IBM850
thank you
A+JYT
PS
Hello,
Karaf console does not display characters correctly é è à... chars.
displayed:
this comes from the evil charset defined System.defaultCharset() is cp1252
but the DOS console is IBM850
thank you
A+JYT
PS: Sorry for my approximative english
--
View this message in context:
http://k
Hi Jamie,
sounds like a good solution for this.
+1
regards, Achim
2012/9/25 Jamie G. :
> The release notes include every jira that was involved in the creation
> of the particular RC, so
>
> * [KARAF-681] - Upgrade to Pax URL 1.3.4
> * [KARAF-1431] - Upgrade to Pax URL 1.3.5
>
> are both captur
The release notes include every jira that was involved in the creation
of the particular RC, so
* [KARAF-681] - Upgrade to Pax URL 1.3.4
* [KARAF-1431] - Upgrade to Pax URL 1.3.5
are both captured in the release notes.
I can see the confusion this could cause however - perhaps adding
"historical