Re: KARAF-1851

Thanks for the reminder, I gonna take a look. Regards JB On 02/07/2013 05:21 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: *Jean-Baptiste, Ioannis* please review / merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1851 Thank you, Andrei -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org

Re: release by subsystem

Hi Andrei, I understand your point. Some parts are really tight together. However, that's the purpose of the minimal distribution and framework: - framework should provide the most minimal Karaf container (however, it embeds Aries Blueprint for instance, as Karaf bundles use it) - minimal is

Re: pax exam 3?

Hi, Right now it doesn't work out of the box. It's missing a working features resolver. There is a jira entry for this already. Regards, Achim sent from mobile device Am 07.02.2013 18:40 schrieb "Andrei Pozolotin" : > *Hi* > > I am curious if any one using pax exam 3 with karaf tests? a

pax exam 3?

*Hi* I am curious if any one using pax exam 3 with karaf tests? any issues? Thank you, Andrei

Re: release by subsystem

It will not work. ServiceMix had multiple repositories/components/releases and it's always the same - to do gozilla release you still need to do submodules release too. Waiting for submodules takes same amount of time, since in ASF everything should be voted. We have very few dependencies and, i

Re: [UPDATE] Karaf branches and features in Karaf 2.3.x

Sounds good to me. Cheers, Jamie On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: > nothing to add; +1 > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:33 PM, wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> following a discussion started a couple of weeks ago, just an update about >> Karaf branches a

release by subsystem

*Jean-Baptiste* I am curious if you envision to change karaf layout so release by subsystem is possible. For example, if I use minimal sub set of karaf, which does not need Aries, why should I wait for it? this is similar to how ops4j was partitioned way back, so there ar

KARAF-1851

*Jean-Baptiste, Ioannis* please review / merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1851 Thank you, Andrei

Re: [UPDATE] Karaf branches and features in Karaf 2.3.x

nothing to add; +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:33 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > following a discussion started a couple of weeks ago, just an update about > Karaf branches and releases: > > - karaf-2.x: I'm going to create this branch asap (let say tonight or > tomorrow). This br

Re: [UPDATE] Karaf branches and features in Karaf 2.3.x

Hi JB, sounds good, I'm able to release Pax-Web 1.1.12 anytime. regards, Achim 2013/2/7 > Hi all, > > following a discussion started a couple of weeks ago, just an update about > Karaf branches and releases: > > - karaf-2.x: I'm going to create this branch asap (let say tonight or > tomorrow)

[UPDATE] Karaf branches and features in Karaf 2.3.x

Hi all, following a discussion started a couple of weeks ago, just an update about Karaf branches and releases: - karaf-2.x: I'm going to create this branch asap (let say tonight or tomorrow). This branch will be the codebase for Karaf 2.4, Karaf 2.5, etc. This branch will be created startin

Re: svn commit: r1443073 [3/3] - in /karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x: ./ admin/command/ admin/core/ admin/management/ archetypes/assembly/ archetypes/blueprint/ archetypes/bundle/ archetypes/command/ arche

Hi David, It would be really cool to have all in the same line ;) Discussing with Seb (on the incubator), he said that the NOTICE should mention all included and used softwares, and the licenses in used. Discussing with other guys, they said that it should be "MINIMAL" ;) I asked Dan about th