Re: [DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
So I started experimenting a bit, and the second solution seems to be very easy to implement. I've been able to deploy an upgraded pax-web 4.2.3-SNAPSHOT with specific Karaf 4 features and install pax-http without any problems (but the change of a few imports in karaf to support pax-web 4.x). So

Re: [DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Uwe Barthel
+1 to handle older specs. -- Uwe Barthel bart...@x-reizend.de On June 11, 2015 5:22:32 PM Jamie G. jamie.goody...@gmail.com wrote: Long as the patched Karaf can handle the older specs too then all is good :) Once the new spec is in place I'll talk to the SDN community about the changes and

Re: [DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Guillaume, I would do for the second one, I think it's easier and make sense for backward compatibility. Regards JB On 06/11/2015 08:51 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I want to work on a nice way to migrate to the new 1.3.0 schema for features for downstream projects (pax-web, cxf,

[DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I want to work on a nice way to migrate to the new 1.3.0 schema for features for downstream projects (pax-web, cxf, activemq, etc…). I have two possible ways in mind which I'd like to discuss. The first one would be to write an additional mojo for the maven plugin which would translate the new

Re: [DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
2015-06-11 17:21 GMT+02:00 Jamie G. jamie.goody...@gmail.com: Long as the patched Karaf can handle the older specs too then all is good :) Definitely ! What I've done, is very simple. It's just about removing the unsupported xml elements when parsing the xml for a 1.3.0 schema, so that jaxb

Re: [DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
It looks good to me ! Thanks, Regards JB On 06/11/2015 05:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: 2015-06-11 17:21 GMT+02:00 Jamie G. jamie.goody...@gmail.com: Long as the patched Karaf can handle the older specs too then all is good :) Definitely ! What I've done, is very simple. It's just about

Re: [DISCUSS] Best way to provide a migration to the new 1.3.0 features schema for downstream projects

2015-06-11 Thread Jamie G.
Long as the patched Karaf can handle the older specs too then all is good :) Once the new spec is in place I'll talk to the SDN community about the changes and help them migrate as well. Cheers, Jamie On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote: So I started