The Transaction Control project in Aries does have a pretty complete overlap
with what’s being proposed here. There are already resource providers for JPA
and JDBC which provide connection pooling, resource local transactions and XA
transactions. It would be great to get some input into a JMS re
+1
Great about forking tranql - finally ;)
regards
Grzegorz
2017-06-16 11:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Nicholson :
>
> Doesn’t this directly clash with OSGi Alliance Transaction Control
> Specification work going on in Aries?
>
> If so, wouldn’t it make more sense for this community to input into that
Doesn’t this directly clash with OSGi Alliance Transaction Control
Specification work going on in Aries?
If so, wouldn’t it make more sense for this community to input into that work
rather than cause needless confusion / fragmentation?
Just a thought.
> On 15 Jun 2017, at 13:55, Toni Menze
