Re: Preparing Karaf 4.2.1 and some ideas

2018-06-17 Thread Francois Papon
+1 for all ! We have to simplify and document the way to make custom distribution for end user ;) I also note many questions about JPA on the mailing list and we will add other examples by provider (Apache OpenJPA, EclipseLink, Hibernate, ...) regards, François Papon fpa...@apache.org Open3m -

Re: Preparing Karaf 4.2.1 and some ideas

2018-06-17 Thread Andrea Cosentino
+1, great work! -- Andrea Cosentino  -- Apache Camel PMC Chair Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix PMC Member Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: oscerd On Sunday, June 17, 2018, 5:17:23 PM GMT+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi

Re: Preparing Karaf 4.2.1 and some ideas

2018-06-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I think that's fair for some use cases, but generally speaking, we should improve the global usage. scope (compile, runtime, provided) is not well used, kar requirement is overhead, the generate mojo is not accurate, etc. I would propose the following: 1. Deprecate the generate features mojo to

Re: Preparing Karaf 4.2.1 and some ideas

2018-06-17 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello At some point I'm going to "fix" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5540 which is a documentation issue of new "overrides and blacklisting" mechanism. In fact this mechanism was created from "custom distro" point of view and some fixes/changes make things easier with custom

Preparing Karaf 4.2.1 and some ideas

2018-06-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, As I started to prepare Karaf 4.2.1, I rebased and cleaned up the examples. The corresponding PR is there: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/484 As already mention on the mailing list, I gonna add new examples asked by users. It seems also that lot of users has difficulties to