Hello,
Am Mi., 19. Mai 2021 um 11:38 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
j...@nanthrax.net>:
> Karaf5 service could be a nice location, but keep in mind that Karaf5
> service are not OSGi service (the osgi application manager is itself a K5
> service).
>
I guess for normal client code it doesnt
Hi
Le mer. 19 mai 2021 à 11:31, Bernd a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that Karaf provides quite useful principals for Roles, Groups and
> Client. But if I want to consume or create those principals in my own code,
> I have to depend on the karaf-boot bundle.
>
> I wonder:
>
> a) would it
Hi Bernd,
Thanks for your feedback and proposal.
Generally speaking I agree with the proposal.
Karaf5 service could be a nice location, but keep in mind that Karaf5 service
are not OSGi service (the osgi application manager is itself a K5 service).
So, I think we can already prepare some
Hello,
I noticed that Karaf provides quite useful principals for Roles, Groups and
Client. But if I want to consume or create those principals in my own code,
I have to depend on the karaf-boot bundle.
I wonder:
a) would it make sense for Karaf5 to move the classes to a more focused API
jar.
Same for me ;)
So, let me refactor and remove "my" feature.simple bundle to include in
features.core.
I will create the PR soon.
Regards
JB
> Le 19 mai 2021 à 09:21, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit :
>
> śr., 19 maj 2021 o 08:59 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
>
>> Yes, both are possible.
>>
śr., 19 maj 2021 o 08:59 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Yes, both are possible.
>
> Maybe keeping all in org.apache.karaf.features.core with a configuration
> to use a different deploy/approach is better than a complete new features
> bundle.
> It’s not a problem to me to refactor what I
Yes, both are possible.
Maybe keeping all in org.apache.karaf.features.core with a configuration to use
a different deploy/approach is better than a complete new features bundle.
It’s not a problem to me to refactor what I did.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
> Le 19 mai 2021 à 08:01, Grzegorz Grzybek
śr., 19 maj 2021 o 07:53 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> Actually, it’s a complete separated bundle.
>
> So, in the Karaf standard distribution, you will have
> org.apache.karaf.features.core in etc/startup.properties: that’s the
> regular/current one with the resolver.
>
>