Yeah, you are right, that is probably for the best
Thank you for your response Romain
El mar, 14 dic 2021 a las 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau ()
escribió:
> Hi Juan,
>
> No real way the vote is reduced cause ASF is distributed and all the PMC
> (at least) must be able to give their vote. (to be hone
Hi Juan,
No real way the vote is reduced cause ASF is distributed and all the PMC
(at least) must be able to give their vote. (to be honest this is for the
good to not be able to say "it is minor, let's do it in 1h", you can't
imagine how many minor upgrades can break apps;)).
This is one of the r
Hi Jean-Baptiste
I understand and I completely support the idea of canceling this vote and
starting a new one. At the same time I wonder if, in benefit of time, the
votation period could be reduced from the standard 72 hours as it's a minor
-but important- change and it should change the previous
As discussed on the vote thread, I cancel this release to include Pax
Logging 2.0.12 that will upgrade to log4j 2.0.16.
I will start a new vote asap.
Sorry about that,
Regards
JB
On 13/12/2021 16:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 to your vote (t
> Jean-Baptiste Onofre :
> Hi guys;
> I cancel this vote to:
> 1. Upgrade to pax-logging 2.0.11 which includes important log4j2 CVE fix
+1 on that!
(I just dropped by today to check if there were any discissions on karaf and
log4j...)
Hi guys;
I cancel this vote to:
1. Upgrade to pax-logging 2.0.11 which includes important log4j2 CVE fix
2. Include a quick fix in the features service and autoRefresh flag (populated
in the cfg file)
I will submit a new take to vote later today.
Sorry about that.
Regards
JB
> Le 7 déc. 2021
