Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/88
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
GitHub user oscerd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/88
[KARAF-3879] jdbc feature should installs pax-jdbc feature
Hi all,
This PR is related to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-3879
Andrea
You can merge this pull request
You right I missed the point that this is focused on xa only. There
should maybe be opened a ticket at aries to also support non xa
datasources as input. Not every jdbc driver has pooling capabilities itself.
Regards
Benjamin
On 18.01.2014 15:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
This is different:
This is different: aries.transaction.jdbc allows you to create a
"standard" datasource using a xadatasource.
It doesn't provide any datasource (you have to provide at least a XA
Datasource).
It's not the same usage.
Where we can see an overlap it's in term of pooling as the Aries
Recoverabl
Hi JB,
well, I'm looking into which features/bundles gets installed how the
templates for specific providers does initialize the datasources (export
blueprint service) Take a look how they can be enhanced
(http://search.maven.org/#search|ga|1|aries.transaction.jdbc) by using
aries transaction
Hi Benjamin,
I'm not sure to follow you.
Did you really take a look in the Karaf JDBC or JMS feature. It's mostly
commands and MBean (not really any runtime providing). We completely
leverage Aries Transaction for instance.
It's the same for JNDI: we complete Aries JNDI (which doesn't provide
Hi JB,
what I'm missing is a link to aries transaction jdbc which is in my
opinion the better template to provide out of the box. I think it's
worth thinking about a closer integration of this feature rather than
doing dbcp stuff for example. Well, of course that is a personally point
of view
Hi Benjamin,
if you take a deeper look, you will see that Karaf JDBC uses Aries
(blueprint and transaction).
Template files uses blueprint. The generic template uses DBCP, the other
templates use specific database/JDBC driver capability. But it's only
template, you can deploy your own dataso
Hi,
actually a lot of JDBC stuff has been done for karaf. I'm just wondering
why it is done so heterogeneously in different apache projects. Karaf
uses blueprint and (not all the time!) dbcp for pooling and creating
datasources. Aries uses blueprint as well (:-)) but using
geronimo/tranql for
