Hey David,
I'm also +1 (with 1.b and 2.2.a) to all of those changes. I would consider
1.b and 2.1 rather as a bug-fix and 2.2(.a) is an optional feature (from a
user point of view); so no problem here.
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 00:13, David Jencks wrote:
> At the risk of ca
Hi David,
+1 for all (with 1b).
Thanks
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
- Reply message -
From: "David Jencks"
To: "General OPS4J" ,
Subject: aether url handler problems and proposed solutio
At the risk of causing total confusion, I'm going to discuss more than one
issue in this email. Please consider looking at the whole message, not just
the first problem.
1. Configuration source (PAXURL-147, KARAF-910). Karaf uses the pax mvn
(aether) url handler during initial startup, and tr
