Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade Quarkus to 3.8.4 for KIE 10.0.0 release

+1 On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:07 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 thank you! > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:00 PM Tibor Zimányi wrote: > > > +1, thank you Alex. > > > > Dňa pi 19. 4. 2024, 21:02 Alex Porcelli > napísal(a): > > > > > I have been exploring the

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

Alex, Yes, in the proposal we just barely outlined. I create the EPIC to have more details and start working on them as soon as we agree. On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:24 PM Alex Porcelli wrote: > Thank you for outlining the tasks post the 10.x release. It's > important to note that these are

Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade Quarkus to 3.8.4 for KIE 10.0.0 release

+1 thank you! On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:00 PM Tibor Zimányi wrote: > +1, thank you Alex. > > Dňa pi 19. 4. 2024, 21:02 Alex Porcelli napísal(a): > > > I have been exploring the possibility of upgrading Quarkus to the > > latest LTS version, 3.8.x, as the current 3.2.x version is nearing the >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade Quarkus to 3.8.4 for KIE 10.0.0 release

+1, thank you Alex. Dňa pi 19. 4. 2024, 21:02 Alex Porcelli napísal(a): > I have been exploring the possibility of upgrading Quarkus to the > latest LTS version, 3.8.x, as the current 3.2.x version is nearing the > end of its support period according to the Quarkus LTS policy [1]. > After

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

Thank you for outlining the tasks post the 10.x release. It's important to note that these are already included in the amended proposal [1], specifically in steps 9 and 10, which the community has voted on. If there are concerns about the execution of these steps, I'd like to reassure you that

[PROPOSAL] Upgrade Quarkus to 3.8.4 for KIE 10.0.0 release

I have been exploring the possibility of upgrading Quarkus to the latest LTS version, 3.8.x, as the current 3.2.x version is nearing the end of its support period according to the Quarkus LTS policy [1]. After overcoming some initial challenges and thanks to the excellent collaboration with Luca

[PROPOSAL] - Moving CLI and SonataFlow images back to SonataFlow operator's repo

Folks, I've outlined the tasks we need once we release 10.x from kie-tools: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1102 Once we release, we can detail this planning and start working on it to have a streamlined process for the next release. Please let me know if it makes sense to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding more counters to existing metric

+1 On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 2:56 PM Pere Fernandez wrote: > +1 > > El dv., 19 d’abr. 2024, 18:06, Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > ftira...@redhat.com> va escriure: > > > Hi all, > > Let me know if there is any problem with the proposal in this issue > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Task and Management consoles images

+1 El dc., 17 d’abr. 2024, 22:40, Tiago Bento va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > As we approach the Apache KIE 10 release, we're preparing the release > scripts on KIE Tools to publish the Task and Management consoles > images to Quay.io. > > Both images moved permanently from `kogito-images` to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding more counters to existing metric

+1 El dv., 19 d’abr. 2024, 18:06, Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < ftira...@redhat.com> va escriure: > Hi all, > Let me know if there is any problem with the proposal in this issue > description. > Thanks >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding more counters to existing metric

+1 Em sex., 19 de abr. de 2024 às 13:05, Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < ftira...@redhat.com> escreveu: > Hi all, > Let me know if there is any problem with the proposal in this issue > description. > Thanks >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding more counters to existing metric

+1 El vie, 19 abr 2024, 18:30, Alex Porcelli escribió: > +1 > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:05 PM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > Let me know if there is any problem with the proposal in this issue > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding more counters to existing metric

+1 On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:05 PM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti wrote: > > Hi all, > Let me know if there is any problem with the proposal in this issue > description. > Thanks

[PROPOSAL] Adding more counters to existing metric

Hi all, Let me know if there is any problem with the proposal in this issue description. Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven artifacts deploy approach

Jan, Thanks for this thread. +1 for unification. What's your preferred approach given your experience with this current infra? IMO, we should focus on the simpler yet proven method. That said, option 4 resonates better with me. On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:50 AM Jan Šťastný wrote: > Hello, > at

[DISCUSS] Maven artifacts deploy approach

Hello, at the moment our CI uses several approaches to do maven artifacts deployment. For the sake of reducing efforts to maintain, it would be great to unify the approach to a single method. And moreover it would be great to use the method that other ASF projects use. I am thus adding our