Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox 0.7.0

2015-12-21 Thread Kevin Minder
+1 (binding) Here is what I’ve done: * Verified the signatures * Cleanly built from source and executed the tests * Tested WebHdfs, WebHCat, Oozie, HBase, Hive Found some minor annoyances in the Groovy samples but we will address those in the planned 0.8. On 12/17/15, 2:02 PM, "Kevin Minder"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox 0.7.0

2015-12-21 Thread Sumit Gupta
+1 (binding) * verified signatures * pulled the 0.7.0 source branch, built and ran tests * tested basic functionality of WebHDFS, WebHCAT, HBase, Yarn (ResourceManager), Storm * tested basic HA functionality with between two Hbase instances. * tested UI services for HDFS, YARN and Hbase (there

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-641) Support CAS / OAuth / OpenID C / SAML protocols using pac4j

2015-12-21 Thread Larry McCay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Larry McCay updated KNOX-641: - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7.0) 0.8.0 > Support CAS / OAuth / OpenID C / SAML protocols

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-641) Support CAS / OAuth / OpenID C / SAML protocols using pac4j

2015-12-21 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jérôme Leleu updated KNOX-641: -- Attachment: knox641.patch2 Second patch > Support CAS / OAuth / OpenID C / SAML protocols using pac4j >

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-641) Support CAS / OAuth / OpenID C / SAML protocols using pac4j

2015-12-21 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15067667#comment-15067667 ] Jérôme Leleu commented on KNOX-641: --- Yes, you get it right: the `testBasicAuth` provider only has pac4j

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-641) Support CAS / OAuth / OpenID C / SAML protocols using pac4j

2015-12-21 Thread Larry McCay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15066385#comment-15066385 ] Larry McCay commented on KNOX-641: -- If my understanding is correct then for testBasicAuth there is no