Re: Follow-up on KNOX-1119

Hi Andreas - I am pulling this into the public lists for visibility and possibly additional insights from our community. This sounds like an interesting usecase. I think that I need to understand the architectural aspects a bit more however. It seems to me that you have the following: 1.

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-1013) Monitor Ambari for Cluster Topology changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Zampino updated KNOX-1013: --- Affects Version/s: 0.14.0 > Monitor Ambari for Cluster Topology changes >

[jira] [Updated] (KNOX-1006) Service Discovery and Topology Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Zampino updated KNOX-1006: --- Affects Version/s: 0.15.0 0.14.0 > Service Discovery and Topology Generation >

Jenkins build is back to normal : Knox-master-patch-scan #63318

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Knox-master-patch-scan #63317

See -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on H1 (Hadoop) in workspace

Re: knox git commit: KNOX-1119 - Pac4J OAuth/OpenID Principal Needs to be Configurable (Andreas Hildebrandt via lmccay)

Actually, looking at it more closely, shouldn't it be "if (idAttribute != null)" ? Colm. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi Larry, > > Just looking at this code block: > > + if (idAttribute == null) { > +id =