smolnar82 opened a new pull request #533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/533
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`TODO`
## How was this patch tested?
`TODO`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
Thanks Larry and Phil,
Makes sense, we could simply rebase the feature branch periodically and
keep it in sync (as Phil pointed out - which would be what we do with the
fork currently).
Thanks for the inputs!
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:32 PM larry mccay wrote:
> +1 to the feature branch plan in
+1 to the feature branch plan in general!
I am -0 on double commits to the feature branch from master.
It seems to me that syncing the feature branch is going to be more or less
what is happening in the forks now but the other benefits to having a
central feature branch here still add significant
Thank you for kicking off this discussion.
I'm in favor of the feature branch for this work, for all the reasons
you've enumerated.
So long as we can preserve the existing review questions/comments from the
fork, I don't think we need to resolve any of those concerns before moving
into a feature b
All,
I would like to get community input on the process of merging Webshell
feature to master.
*Problem*:
1. We would like to get this feature in by 2.0 but also would like to make
sure we get a proper reviews for this feature.
2. Given the size of the feature, keeping it up to date with recent co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on KNOX-2680 started by Sandor Molnar.
---
> Centralized Source of Cluster Configuration Details for Discovery
> -
