Re: Back to one dev branch

2016-03-10 Thread Zhao, John
Sender:hongbin mamahong...@apache.org >Recipient:dev...@kylin.apache.org >Date:Thursday, Mar 10, 2016 13:57 >Subject:Re: Back to one dev branch > > >+1 pointing the latest dev branch is more intuitive for those who are not that >familiar with Kylin dev. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at

Re: Re: Back to one dev branch

2016-03-09 Thread 13802880...@139.com
+1 and the roadmap should be included 中国移动广东有限公司 网管中心 梁猛 13802880...@139.com From: Dong Li Date: 2016-03-10 14:00 To: dev Subject: Re: Back to one dev branch +1 then developers would got better experience on git repository. :) Thanks, Dong Li Original Message Sender:hongbin

Re: Back to one dev branch

2016-03-09 Thread Dong Li
+1 then developers would got better experience on git repository. :) Thanks, Dong Li Original Message Sender:hongbin mamahong...@apache.org Recipient:dev...@kylin.apache.org Date:Thursday, Mar 10, 2016 13:57 Subject:Re: Back to one dev branch +1 pointing the latest dev branch is more

Re: Back to one dev branch

2016-03-09 Thread hongbin ma
+1 pointing the latest dev branch is more intuitive for those who are not that familiar with Kylin dev. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Li Yang wrote: > Hi all > > With the settling of 1.3.0 release, the development of 1.x-staging will > come to a maintenance mode. New

Back to one dev branch

2016-03-09 Thread Li Yang
Hi all With the settling of 1.3.0 release, the development of 1.x-staging will come to a maintenance mode. New features have been and will go on in 2.x-staging, which is the main dev branch. So I'd like to take this chance to go back to a more common branch setup -- *let master be the main dev