Re: [l10n-dev] N. Korean localization : Impossible?

2005-04-13 Thread Kim IlYong
Hi all, First, thank you for your interests and discussions. We have dicussed about N. Korean support in OOo, and there is no solution yet. I had some understanding why Sun had to cancel my patches. I hope Sun developers and Legal Dept to answer my questions: 1. OOo is a open source project, so

Re: [l10n-dev] Locale data alignment with CLDR

2005-04-13 Thread Peter Nugent
Hi Eike It's great that this is going ahead. Is there any plan for migrating the "main players" to CLDR ? thx Peter Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > In CWS localedata4 (CVS branch cws_src680_localedata4) I will start to > align greater parts of the locale data with data pulled from the CLDR. > The l

Re: [l10n-dev] dictionary & affix file for bangla?

2005-04-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Jamil, On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:10:34 +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote: > >has any one submitted dictionary & affix files for bangla language and > >what is > >the language code for bangla in openoffice.org? > > According the url below, > http://api.openoffice.org/source/browse/api/offapi/com/sun/

Re: [l10n-dev] Locale data alignment with CLDR

2005-04-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Peter, On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:03:22 +0100, Peter Nugent wrote: > It's great that this is going ahead. Is there any plan for migrating the > "main players" to CLDR ? I hope we can get them in for OOo2.0.1, but currently there are too many discrepancies in various locales, see the latest re

[l10n-dev] Re: [native-lang] Re: [l10n-dev] N. Korean localization : Impossible?

2005-04-13 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Hello Kim Il Yong, thank you for your mail. I think it's very courageous for a north korean citizen to post on public list. In fact I find that rather disturbing and I worry for your safety. For reasons I have already explained, we are going to deal with this issue off list. So please, stop posti

[l10n-dev] Re: [native-lang] ml language project

2005-04-13 Thread Charles-H.Schulz
Hello Manu, I've put Vijay Kumar, Indic NL group coordinator in copy of this email. I'm not competent to answer your problem, but for the language ID you should open an issue on IssueZilla (component: L10N) and get it. Later, Charles. On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 01:55 -0700, manu unni wrote: > Hi all

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [native-lang] Re: [l10n-dev] N. Korean localization : Impossible?

2005-04-13 Thread Elizabeth Matthis
Charles-H.Schulz wrote: Hello Kim Il Yong, thank you for your mail. I think it's very courageous for a north korean citizen to post on public list. In fact I find that rather disturbing and I worry for your safety. For reasons I have already explained, we are going to deal with this issue off list

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [native-lang] Re: [l10n-dev] N. Korean localization : Impossible?

2005-04-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Elizabeth, On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 16:39:05 +0200, Elizabeth Matthis wrote: > p.s. I purposely wrote this to the public lists so people > know that Sun is indeed listening and researching this and > can stop wondering if we care. We do. Again, thank you and Erwin for taking over. Eike -

[l10n-dev] Much too many TODOs in locale data audit

2005-04-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, I updated http://l10n.openoffice.org/i18n_framework/cldr/LocaleDataAudit_OOo_CLDR.html as far as I could. The outcome is a bunch of orange cells in the Solution columns with far too many TODOs. As a result, only a few locales will get aligned to the CLDR in this round. I urge every localizat

Re: [l10n-dev] Much too many TODOs in locale data audit

2005-04-13 Thread Hristo Simenov Hristov
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 18:31, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > > I updated > http://l10n.openoffice.org/i18n_framework/cldr/LocaleDataAudit_OOo_CLDR.htm >l > > as far as I could. The outcome is a bunch of orange cells in the > Solution columns with far too many TODOs. As a result, only a few > loca

Re: [l10n-dev] Much too many TODOs in locale data audit

2005-04-13 Thread Peter Nugent
if you have already provided feedback (as you have Hristo) then nothing further is required I believe. I assume there are no "TODO: clarify" items for your locale (the site seems to be unreachable at the moment) Peter Hristo Simenov Hristov wrote: > On Wednesday 13 April 2005 18:31, Eike Rathke w

Re: [l10n-dev] Much too many TODOs in locale data audit

2005-04-13 Thread Peter Nugent
Eike Can you provide the exact list of locales to be aligned to CLDR for 2.0 ? thx Peter Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > > I updated > http://l10n.openoffice.org/i18n_framework/cldr/LocaleDataAudit_OOo_CLDR.html > > as far as I could. The outcome is a bunch of orange cells in the > Solution column

Re: [l10n-dev] N. Korean localization : Impossible?

2005-04-13 Thread Kim IlYong
Hi Charles, --- "Charles-H.Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Kim Il Yong, > > thank you for your mail. I think it's very courageous for a north > korean citizen to post on public list. > In fact I find that rather disturbing and I worry for your safety. Thank you for your care, and I'm

Re: [l10n-dev] Much too many TODOs in locale data audit

2005-04-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Hristo, On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 18:56:19 +0300, Hristo Simenov Hristov wrote: > So, what can I do? > Acording to this: http://www.jtcsv.com/cgibin/locale-bugs?findid=459 > I think that it is fixed. That's for the bg_BG locale, which in the audit document has no TODO item, so nothing to do ;-

Re: [l10n-dev] Much too many TODOs in locale data audit

2005-04-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Peter, On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 17:51:51 +0100, Peter Nugent wrote: > Can you provide the exact list of locales to be aligned to CLDR for 2.0 ? That's at the bottom of the cldr.otl I attached, you also quoted it ;-) > > [_] 0% Locales to be aligned > > [_] ar_E

Re: [l10n-dev] CJK language selection feature -- how does it work?

2005-04-13 Thread Arne Götje (高盛華)
On Thursday 07 April 2005 17:06, Herbert Duerr wrote: > > I'm a font developer and I'd like my fonts to support this feature > > to display different presentation forms for some glyphs, depending > > on which language the user chooses. > > > > Can someone explain me in detail which OTF features are