[l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Serg Bormant
Hello. OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this by design and we need to wait special l10n build or something goes wrong? -- wbr, sb - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[l10n-dev] About Uyghur Translations

2010-04-27 Thread Gheyret Tohti
Hi, My Name is Gheyret. Native Uyghur.Last year we can translated OO.o PO UI using http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/ and I was cordinator of Uyghur Translation Team. Later I find that Uyghur moved to http://pootle2.sunvirtuallab.com/ . but I cannot access using my 

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Rafaella Braconi
Hi Serg, Serg Bormant ha scritto: Hello. OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this by design and we need to wait special l10n build or something goes wrong? we are targeting the m17 to integrate the translations.So ye, in the m16 you won't find the

Re: [l10n-dev] About Uyghur Translations

2010-04-27 Thread Rafaella Braconi
Hi Gheyret, Gheyret Tohti ha scritto: Hi, My Name is Gheyret. Native Uyghur.Last year we can translated OO.o PO UI using http://pootle.sunvirtuallab.com/ and I was cordinator of Uyghur Translation Team. Later I find that Uyghur moved to http://pootle2.sunvirtuallab.com/ . but I cannot access

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Serg, no, m16 doesn't contain the fixes from the 2nd L10N round. IMHO they will be in CWS ooo321l10n4 and it's planned to integrate them into the next milestone. Best regards Marcus Serg Bormant wrote: OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this by

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.2.1 developer snapshot build OOO320m16 available

2010-04-27 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA teams, developer snapshot build OOO320m16 which installs as OOo-Dev 3.2.1 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. Please

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi, this build should contain all fixes from the first round but not the fixes from the current one I do. Can you give some examples what you fix what time ? Cheers, Ivo On 27.04.2010 08:18, Serg Bormant wrote: Hello. OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes.

[l10n-dev] m77

2010-04-27 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hello, can someone point me to the m77's sdf file. It is not on the mirrors yet. Thanks, m.

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Serg Bormant
Hi, yes, m16 contains 1st l10n round fixes and doesn't contain 2nd. So, this is by design. Thanks for explanation. -- wbr, sb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi, the new builds are comming soon! Cheers, Ivo Serg Bormant wrote: Hi, yes, m16 contains 1st l10n round fixes and doesn't contain 2nd. So, this is by design. Thanks for explanation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [l10n-dev] m77

2010-04-27 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi, the sdf-extract-from-master method is broken right now, I will have a look onto it. Cheers, Ivo Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hello, can someone point me to the m77's sdf file. It is not on the mirrors yet. Thanks, m. -

Re: [l10n-dev] m77

2010-04-27 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hello, Pavel has it: http://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/DEV300/DEV300_m77/Build-1/POT/OpenOffice.org-DEV300_m77-POT.tar.gz Gzipped file contains single pot files as well as the en-US sdf. Lp, m. 2010/4/27 Ivo Hinkelmann ivo.hinkelm...@sun.com Hi, the