Hi Rafaella, Andrea and Marcus, From: Marcus Lange <marcus.la...@oracle.com> Subject: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.3 - PLS approve and request language versions Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:18:55 +0100
> Here we want to step in with a smaller test amount to help to release > these languages, too. AFAIK we haven't seen any bigger issues which > are language dependent, so IMHO we can assume that a more simple test > is sufficiant for the remaining languages. yes. If there are many problems on some specific packages - and users may notice there are problems, then fix them by themselves. > So, an automated testing is what we are offering. yes. Automated test is quite good for every language. My PPC builds are usually left as RCs. In my impression, less than 10 percent of my builds are approved. In any case, the NL lead should would take an action. If some NL leads approves automatic release for every RCs, it's okay. Others can offer ingredients; some results for automatic tests. NL leads judge the results, and approve if they think it's okay. thanks, -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/ http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l10n.openoffice.org
