Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Central po repository

2006-12-21 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 21/12/2006, at 8:22 AM, Ain Vagula wrote (in part): I'm against Pootle as storage and against all about OLT at this point of time. We have translators, who used gettext based tools (also open btw) for a years and who also participate in many other projects (KDE, Gnome, GNU applications,

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Central po repository

2006-12-20 Thread Marcin Miłkowski
I'm against Pootle as storage and against all about OLT at this point of time. We have translators, who used gettext based tools (also open btw) for a years and who also participate in many other projects (KDE, Gnome, GNU applications, various distributions like SUSE, Mandriva - and reuse also tr

[l10n-dev] Re: Central po repository

2006-12-20 Thread Ain Vagula
Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > Hi All, > > I think we should not overestimate Pootle. It doesn't support > translation memories (it doesn't support fuzzy matching) because of > performance considerations. And that makes it something roughly equal > to subversion/CVS, and not really a perfect translat

[l10n-dev] Re: Central po repository

2006-12-20 Thread Ain Vagula
Rafaella Braconi wrote: > Hi Charles, Pavel, All, > > indeed some weeks, we started looking at the pootle server to see if > this could be an option for the OOo N-L Community. The pootle server > seems to have some quite nice features that might be very helpful during > the translation process: e