On 2/23/06, Rail Aliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 00:36, Thu 23.02.06, Ain Vagula wrote:
> >Almost in whole pre 2.0 and (I believe) also pre 2.0.1 period the
> >underlined shortcuts didnt need to be translated, as oo.o has put them
> >automatically in translated versions. It was very nice feat
On 2/23/06, Rail Aliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 00:36, Thu 23.02.06, Ain Vagula wrote:
> >Almost in whole pre 2.0 and (I believe) also pre 2.0.1 period the
> >underlined shortcuts didnt need to be translated, as oo.o has put them
> >automatically in translated versions. It was very nice feat
Almost in whole pre 2.0 and (I believe) also pre 2.0.1 period the
underlined shortcuts didnt need to be translated, as oo.o has put them
automatically in translated versions. It was very nice feature,
because this avoided a lot of errors with duplicate shortcuts
(specally in dynamically changing me
On 00:36, Thu 23.02.06, Ain Vagula wrote:
Almost in whole pre 2.0 and (I believe) also pre 2.0.1 period the
underlined shortcuts didnt need to be translated, as oo.o has put them
automatically in translated versions. It was very nice feature,
because this avoided a lot of errors with duplicate sh
