Re: [l10n-dev] Functions with _ADD in Calc: translatable?

2010-08-14 Thread Jordi Serratosa
El 13/08/2010 11:51, en/na Eike Rathke ha escrit: Hi Jordi, On Thursday, 2010-08-12 21:43:36 +0200, Jordi Serratosa wrote: Am I right assuming in Calc functions the "_ADD" suffix (for "Add-in", for example, "ISEVEN_ADD") is not translatable? Yes, the _ADD suffix is programmatically appended

Re: [l10n-dev] Functions with _ADD in Calc: translatable?

2010-08-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Jordi, On Thursday, 2010-08-12 21:43:36 +0200, Jordi Serratosa wrote: > Am I right assuming in Calc functions the "_ADD" suffix (for > "Add-in", for example, "ISEVEN_ADD") is not translatable? Yes, the _ADD suffix is programmatically appended for functions that have an internal equivalent and

[l10n-dev] Functions with _ADD in Calc: translatable?

2010-08-12 Thread Jordi Serratosa
Hi Am I right assuming in Calc functions the "_ADD" suffix (for "Add-in", for example, "ISEVEN_ADD") is not translatable? I cannot find any of them (nor the "_ADD" suffix) in any .po file for the IU part. In the localized Ooo Calc, the formula editor shows the first part of the function tran