[l10n-dev] OOO320m16

Hello. OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this by design and we need to wait special l10n build or something goes wrong? -- wbr, sb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffi

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

Hi Serg, Serg Bormant ha scritto: Hello. OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this by design and we need to wait special l10n build or something goes wrong? we are targeting the m17 to integrate the translations.So ye, in the m16 you won't find the late

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

Hi Serg, no, m16 doesn't contain the fixes from the 2nd L10N round. IMHO they will be in CWS "ooo321l10n4" and it's planned to integrate them into the next milestone. Best regards Marcus Serg Bormant wrote: OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this b

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

Hi, this build should contain all fixes from the first round but not the fixes from the current one I do. Can you give some examples what you fix what time ? Cheers, Ivo On 27.04.2010 08:18, Serg Bormant wrote: Hello. OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes.

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

Hi, yes, m16 contains 1st l10n round fixes and doesn't contain 2nd. So, this is by design. Thanks for explanation. -- wbr, sb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h.

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

Hi, the new builds are comming soon! Cheers, Ivo Serg Bormant wrote: Hi, yes, m16 contains 1st l10n round fixes and doesn't contain 2nd. So, this is by design. Thanks for explanation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr