Hi Andrea,
On Friday, 2009-04-10 22:55:07 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> But apparently most (all?) function names, also of functions that have
> existed for years, had to be translated again for OOo 3.1 (Paolo Pozzan
> knows more about it), so I would not completely exclude that
> translations
sophie wrote:
> Cor Nouws wrote:
> > So something with integration / building did go wrong.
> > Any other experiences in this direction?
>
> Not from side, error is (unfortunately) mine.
>From our first investigations, it seems it was our (Italian
translators') mistake.
But apparently most (all?
Hi Cor,
Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Triggered by the mail from Andrea Pescetti, we found that many functions
> in Calc of the Dutch RC1 are English ...
>
> Dick (digro) checked Pootle and saw that there all translations are
> correct.
So please, as for Italian group, open an issue and promote it
Hi,
Triggered by the mail from Andrea Pescetti, we found that many functions
in Calc of the Dutch RC1 are English ...
Dick (digro) checked Pootle and saw that there all translations are
correct.
So something with integration / building did go wrong.
Any other experiences in this direction?
