[jira] [Closed] (LENS-1429) Queries failing intermittently with NO_REF_COL_AVAILABLE

2017-08-16 Thread Divakar Tomar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Divakar Tomar closed LENS-1429. --- verified > Queries failing intermittently with NO_REF_COL_AVAILABLE >

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128709#comment-16128709 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1459: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1433 (See

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1459: --- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Time union candidate

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128696#comment-16128696 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1459: Committed myself. > Time union candidate creation phase

[jira] [Closed] (LENS-1430) Expressions are not getting resolved correctly in union query

2017-08-16 Thread Divakar Tomar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Divakar Tomar closed LENS-1430. --- verified > Expressions are not getting resolved correctly in union query >

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128654#comment-16128654 ] Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1459: - Applied patch:

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128641#comment-16128641 ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on LENS-1459: --- +1 > Time union candidate creation phase is

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1459: --- Attachment: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch > Time union candidate creation phase is

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128628#comment-16128628 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1459: Small enough diff. Attaching directly > Time union

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1459: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Time union candidate creation phase is creating a

[jira] [Created] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
Rajat Khandelwal created LENS-1459: -- Summary: Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates Key: LENS-1459 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128596#comment-16128596 ] Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1439: - Applied patch:

[jira] [Closed] (LENS-1433) Virtual Fact over a fact with single storage - multi update period is writing wrong query

2017-08-16 Thread Divakar Tomar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Divakar Tomar closed LENS-1433. --- verified > Virtual Fact over a fact with single storage - multi update period is writing > wrong query >

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128569#comment-16128569 ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on LENS-1439: --- [~prongs] Can we add unit test? > Having

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1439: --- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1439: --- Attachment: LENS-1439.01.patch > Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128554#comment-16128554 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1439: Taking patch from reviewboard and attaching > Having

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128552#comment-16128552 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1439: Created https://reviews.apache.org/r/61683/ > Having

[jira] [Work started] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on LENS-1439 started by Rajat Khandelwal. -- > Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing >

Review Request 61683: LENS-1439: Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61683/ --- Review request for lens. Bugs: LENS-1439

[jira] [Reopened] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal reopened LENS-1439: Reopening as the issue is not fixed. > Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-08-16 Thread Divakar Tomar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Divakar Tomar updated LENS-1439: Comment: was deleted (was: verified ) > Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a