+1
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Arshad Matin
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ajay Yadav wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Signature looks good.
> > Validated Checksum.
> > Built from source. All tests ran fine.
> > LICENSE & NOTICE look ok
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ajay Y
+1
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Ajay Yadav wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Signature looks good.
> Validated Checksum.
> Built from source. All tests ran fine.
> LICENSE & NOTICE look ok
>
>
> Cheers
> Ajay Yadava
>
>
> Cheers
> Ajay Yadava
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Deepak Kumar Ba
+1 (non-binding)
Signature looks good.
Validated Checksum.
Built from source. All tests ran fine.
LICENSE & NOTICE look ok
Cheers
Ajay Yadava
Cheers
Ajay Yadava
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Deepak Kumar Barr (Tech_BLR) <
deepak.b...@flipkart.com> wrote:
> Looks good +1. Was able to buil
Looks good +1. Was able to build from source and run test cases.
Regards,
Deepak Kumar Barr
Bigfoot-Apps
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Yash Sharma wrote:
> +1 Binding.
> Verified artifacts, Able to download, build and run sample queries on both
> source and binary distributions.
>
>
> P.S.
+1 Binding.
Verified artifacts, Able to download, build and run sample queries on both
source and binary distributions.
P.S. : I stumbled across this error while building source first time, but
am not able to reproduce it. It might be and env issue with my box. Did
anyone else face this ?
[ERROR
+1 (Binding)
Verified the release candidate :
- Signature looks good
- Validated checksums
- LICENSE and NOTICE look ok.
- Built from source.
- Ran examples from binary distribution. All queries passed
Earlier I removed node/node_modules from rat_check, seems it is stuck there.
Thanks
Amareshwa
Gentle Reminder!!
Release VOTE will be closed at 7PM IST today. Please find some time for
verifying release candidate and put up your vote.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rajat Khandelwal
wrote:
> +1
>
> Build succeeded
> MD5, SHA512 are okay
> LICENCE and NOTICE are okay.
>
--
Thanks
Raj
+1
Build succeeded
MD5, SHA512 are okay
LICENCE and NOTICE are okay.
as well.
>
> Regards
> Srikanth Sundarrajan
>
> > From: raju@gmail.com
> > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:35:56 +0800
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
> > To: dev@lens.apache.org
> >
> > @Srikanth, Please let me know if you find any li
Verified the release candidate :
- Signature looks good
- Validated checksums
- LICENSE and NOTICE look ok.
- Built from source. But facing issues with lens-ui module.
- Ran examples from binary distribution. All queries passed.
Will put up my vote once i figured out issues with lens-ui module.
nary tar ball looked good as well.
Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan
> From: raju@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:35:56 +0800
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
> To: dev@lens.apache.org
>
> @Srikanth, Please let me know if you find any license issues? I f
t;> > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Looks like compiled node modules are included in the source tar ball
>> > > > (under lens-ui). I think this has to be respun.
>> > > >
>> > > > -1 binding
>> &g
; > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks like compiled node modules are included in the source tar ball
> > > > (under lens-ui). I think this has to be respun.
> > > >
> > > > -1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> >
un.
> > >
> > > -1 binding
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Srikanth Sundarrajan
> > >
> > > > From: srik...@hotmail.com
> > > > To: dev@lens.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
>
t; (under lens-ui). I think this has to be respun.
> >
> > -1 binding
> >
> > Regards
> > Srikanth Sundarrajan
> >
> > > From: srik...@hotmail.com
> > > To: dev@lens.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
; -1 binding
>
> Regards
> Srikanth Sundarrajan
>
> > From: srik...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@lens.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
> > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:42:27 +0530
> >
> > Checked Signatures & checksums and found
Looks like compiled node modules are included in the source tar ball (under
lens-ui). I think this has to be respun.
-1 binding
Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan
> From: srik...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@lens.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
> Date: Thu, 19
Checked Signatures & checksums and found them to be ok.
There seems to be licensing issues around lens-ui module. On cursory rat check,
there seemed many violations. Will do a more thorough check and record my vote.
Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan
> From: r...@apache.org
> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015
+1 Binding.
- Able to access links and download artifacts
- Able to build from Source distribution
- README, NOTICE & LICENSE files present
- Able to launch sample queries from source and binary distributions
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Raju Bairishetti wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose
19 matches
Mail list logo
