Re: Extending usecase-fw with cforms

Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: today I was trying to extend our usecase-fw with cforms. Everything was looking great, because I could reuse all of the architecture and just added some if/else clauses. looks good as far as i can tell, some comments below. much cleaner th

Re: [Vote] [1.4] JCR-only vs. Repository Abstraction Layer

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Vote: (a) Lenya should focus on JCR only. It is OK to implement core functionality which absolutely relies on JCR features. +1 How will be the migration from 1.2 to 1.4? Will be great to provide at least an automated repository migration for current users. Is tha

Login usecase (was Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding)

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 00:24 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > I expect most of my focus will be on changes need in Forrest rather than > Lenya itself. Although as time progresses I hope to learn Lenya (I even > installed a local copy last night, I've not actually played with it yet > thoug :-( - go

URI mangling magic (was: Re: Repository structure)

On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 10:13 +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > What I am concerned with for quite some time is our URI mangling magic > stuff. IMO he have way too much semantics and implicit contracts in our > URIs, especially when it comes to embedding (a page and pictures on the > page) or linkin

Re: when to call a vote

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 11:49 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > [...] > > > The main thing is, don't call a Vote to make > > a coding decision. > > Thanks for the reminder. Yes, I told David. ;-) salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding

Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: I reckon, gregor is right and we should use our doco branch for that. The demo we can set up either @forrest or @lenya zones. I do not care, I have permissions on both. ;-) Anyway what you said is true and the recent discussion on the PMC list

Re: problem with usecases

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] By starting lenya in jetty (servlet-debug) and attaching Eclipse, i guess? Never worked out for me, but i will try. What didn't work? http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/HowToLenyaInEclipseDebugger At the very bottom, "2nd way" is sufficient. A

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding

Thorsten Scherler wrote: I reckon, gregor is right and we should use our doco branch for that. The demo we can set up either @forrest or @lenya zones. I do not care, I have permissions on both. ;-) Anyway what you said is true and the recent discussion on the PMC lists about commit access for a

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:57 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 13:25 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > > > >>Thorsten Scherler wrote: > >> > >>[...] > >> > >> > >>>Lets startup small to have something to play with (like in every good > >>>Las Vegas weddi

Re: Extending usecase-fw with cforms

Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hmm, thanks for the tip I will have a look. The only think is that I do not understand how that is happening. I am using cocoon-2.1.x lenya-1.4.x both on latest revision. Anyway, another tip how I can fix that for us. roll back to xalan 2.6.1 for now. if there a

Re: Extending usecase-fw with cforms

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 21:07 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... > > > > cause: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > > > javax.xml.transform.dom.DOMResult.getNextSibling()Lorg/w3c/dom/Node; > > > > mismatch between jaxp version and xalan version. you probably have xalan > > 2.7 with an old (pre 1.3 JAX

Reality check on 1.4x (long)

I'm a would-be user, evaluating lenya for a site possibly going online later this fall. I know the Open Source way of doing things is "if something doesn't work for you, fix-it", but I frankly cannot get up to the knowledge required to debug the things I'm reporting in this message. I hope my c

Re: Extending usecase-fw with cforms

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:02 +0200, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > today I was trying to extend our usecase-fw with cforms. Everything was > > looking great, because I could reuse all of the architecture and just > > added some if/else clauses. > > looks good as far as

Re: Extending usecase-fw with cforms

Thorsten Scherler wrote: today I was trying to extend our usecase-fw with cforms. Everything was looking great, because I could reuse all of the architecture and just added some if/else clauses. looks good as far as i can tell, some comments below. much cleaner than the cforms integration in

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding

Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 13:25 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: [...] Lets startup small to have something to play with (like in every good Las Vegas wedding, chips are on the house). ;-) We have an unrelated thread on Forrest list regarding

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding

Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 13:25 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: [...] Lets startup small to have something to play with (like in every good Las Vegas wedding, chips are on the house). ;-) Is there an SVN repo? We have a doco branch, but that is

Extending usecase-fw with cforms

Hi all, today I was trying to extend our usecase-fw with cforms. Everything was looking great, because I could reuse all of the architecture and just added some if/else clauses. Now when I come to the point of creating the form instance I always get an exception (see stack ->java.lang.NoSuchMetho

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding (was: Repository structure)

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 13:25 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > [...] > > > Lets startup small to have something to play with (like in every good > > Las Vegas wedding, chips are on the house). ;-) > > Is there an SVN repo? We have a doco branch, but that is never been

Re: mod_lenya

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, obvious but to make it right, see below... joerg wrote: > Hi there, > > I have been on ApacheCon Europe and have been to the Lenya Session. > It was good and gave me appetiet about lenya! > > I have been doing Content Management both in b

Re: SiteTreeNode interface in 1.4

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Jann Forrer wrote: > > Hi > > > > In lenya-1.2.x there was a setNodeAttribute defined in the SiteTreeNode > > interface whereas I did not find such a method in 1.4. > > As far as i remember the method was added in order to easily change > > attributes

Re: SiteTreeNode interface in 1.4

Jann Forrer wrote: Hi In lenya-1.2.x there was a setNodeAttribute defined in the SiteTreeNode interface whereas I did not find such a method in 1.4. As far as i remember the method was added in order to easily change attributes of a node without deleting and adding the same node again (only to c

SiteTreeNode interface in 1.4

Hi In lenya-1.2.x there was a setNodeAttribute defined in the SiteTreeNode interface whereas I did not find such a method in 1.4. As far as i remember the method was added in order to easily change attributes of a node without deleting and adding the same node again (only to change an attribute).

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36244] - ProxyGenerator doesn't understand https

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36244] New: - ProxyGenerator doesn't understand https

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Call of publet sitemap

Hi I try to call a publet sitemap (from a browser). Does someone know if that is possible and how the URL is constructed? Thanks Felix -- Felix Röthenbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya http://www.wyona.com

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: [...] By starting lenya in jetty (servlet-debug) and attaching Eclipse, i guess? Never worked out for me, but i will try. What didn't work? http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/HowToLenyaInEclipseDebugger At the very bottom, "2nd way" is sufficient. Are there alternatives for

Re: problem with usecases

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] I have removed those usecases and there is no difference in the behaviour. It seems like the revision controller file creates the error. Are you sure this couldn't be created by the jcr configuration? No, I'm not sure at all. It looks li

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: [...] I have removed those usecases and there is no difference in the behaviour. It seems like the revision controller file creates the error. Are you sure this couldn't be created by the jcr configuration? No, I'm not sure at all. It looks like there is no revision co

Re: Forrest and Lenya - Las Vegas wedding (was: Repository structure)

Thorsten Scherler wrote: [...] Lets startup small to have something to play with (like in every good Las Vegas wedding, chips are on the house). ;-) Is there an SVN repo? I could start with a basic Lenya module/publet which provides the XDoc resource type. -- Andreas --

Re: problem with usecases

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] Well, the only difference with the trunk that could be relevant is the jcr repository. I commented the repository.xconf, because i do not use the jr at this time. There are some xsl sheets added,

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] Well, the only difference with the trunk that could be relevant is the jcr repository. I commented the repository.xconf, because i do not use the jr at this time. There are some xsl sheets added, but that cannot do any h

Re: problem with usecases

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] Well, the only difference with the trunk that could be relevant is the jcr repository. I commented the repository.xconf, because i do not use the jr at this time. There are some xsl sheets added, but that cannot do any harm. Could the jcr con

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: [...] Well, the only difference with the trunk that could be relevant is the jcr repository. I commented the repository.xconf, because i do not use the jr at this time. There are some xsl sheets added, but that cannot do any harm. Could the jcr config cause the problems?

Re: Repository structure

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 23:36 +0200, Michael Wechner wrote: > I think Lenya should be able to read and write to Forrest. Again no offense > and please apologize for sounding harsh, but I think if Lenya is not able > to provide such interfaces it's really useless. > > Michi Just go ahead write down

Re: problem with usecases

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] The submit step does seem to work, unlike the Publish step. Sorry to keep on bugging you, but do you have any ideas? The same message occurs when publishing a document: "The single document canno

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] The submit step does seem to work, unlike the Publish step. Sorry to keep on bugging you, but do you have any ideas? The same message occurs when publishing a document: "The single document cannot be published because th

Re: problem with usecases

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: [...] The submit step does seem to work, unlike the Publish step. Sorry to keep on bugging you, but do you have any ideas? The same message occurs when publishing a document: "The single document cannot be published because the workflow event canno

Re: Repository structure

Andreas Hartmann wrote: Our community is quite small, I'd say we shouldn't trade stability, robustness, and maturity for virtually limitless flexibility and optional customization - at least not when it's about the very heart of our application. exactly. a lot of the work that went into lenya

Re: Repository structure

Michael Wechner wrote: [...] I think Lenya should be able to read and write to Forrest. Again no offense and please apologize for sounding harsh, but I think if Lenya is not able to provide such interfaces it's really useless. Just a few words along Felix' lines: JCR is an API, a set of inte

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: [...] The submit step does seem to work, unlike the Publish step. Sorry to keep on bugging you, but do you have any ideas? The same message occurs when publishing a document: "The single document cannot be published because the workflow event cannot be invoke" It looks r

Re: Publet question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but I think this is a very important question. From my point of view publets had the goal to provide the necessary resource types and usecases for a specific part of a publication, e.g. a blog publet, just as you actually describe it above. A Usecase is currently defin

Re: Repository structure

Michael Wechner wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Michael Wechner wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: With the current Lenya 1.4, this would mean to implement a custom DocumentIdToPathMapper and a custom SiteManager. But - do we really want to allow editing a Forrest site? sure. No offense, bu

Re: Repository structure

Michael Wechner wrote: [...] sure. No offense, but if Lenya isn't able to do this, then Lenya is pretty useless. If Lenya doesn't allow building a Forrest publication, then I think we have totally missed the goal of providing a Content Management Framework I don't think that we will be abl

Re: problem with usecases

Robert Goene wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Robert Goene wrote: Hi, I cannot submit, nor publish, nor deactivate any pages after a trunk update of 1.4. Is it possible that this is caused by the removal of usecase.xmap? It should work ag

Re: Repository structure

Michi wrote: > Flexibility doesn't mean we have to implement all scenarios, but > provide interfaces which allow various scenarios. Sure. The Interface you are looking for is called "Jackrabbit backend". Think reuse here! Regards, Torsten > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> Michael Wechner wrote: >>