[zone] - [lenya.trunk.update] lenya-trunk tests failed

At lenya.zones.apache.org [lenya.trunk.update] lenya-trunk tests failed Please help to fix the tests. ATM most of them fail because they are empty. See logfile: http://lenya.zones.apache.org/log/lenya.trunk.update.log - To uns

Re: HEADSUP: trunk temporarily broken...

Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: yours truly just f...ed up the svn trunk in a misguided attempt to create a branch. the last known good revision is 562875. clean-up work is underway, but it may be an hour or so before the damage is undone. should be fixed now. in case i forgot something, you can yel

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42952] - [PATCH] document authorizer grants access for *any* role

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

HEADSUP: trunk temporarily broken...

hi everyone! yours truly just f...ed up the svn trunk in a misguided attempt to create a branch. the last known good revision is 562875. clean-up work is underway, but it may be an hour or so before the damage is undone. sorry for the hassle, jörn -- Jörn Nettingsmeier "One of my most pr

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42558] - [Patch] lenya.properties.xml per publication

Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > Markus Angst wrote: >>> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-02 14:08 --- >>> (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) > I see two solutions: > > - modules and publications have to use name prefixes > > - prope

Making Bugzilla easier

A couple of months ago Thorsten proposed migrate Lenya's bug tracking from Bugzilla to JIRA. I think most people either agreed or didn't feel very strongly. I don't know what the status of the migration is, other than perhaps waiting for the 2.0 release? In any case, I want to point out that the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42421] - Consolidate release management guidelines

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Lenya Wiki] Update of "FrontPage" by JörnNettings meier

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Lenya Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörnNettingsmeier: http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/FrontPage -- * Site

[Lenya Wiki] Update of "OverviewAuthenticationAndAuthoriz ation" by JörnNettingsmeier

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Lenya Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörnNettingsmeier: http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/OverviewAuthenticationAndAuthorization ---

coding style

hi everyone! on our website, we claim to adhere to sun's recommended coding style: http://lenya.apache.org/docs/coding-guidelines.html in our code, however, we do not :) particularly the order of methods and properties in class files is a real mess in most cases. can we just stick to http://

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42994] - workflow.xml should be moved into the core

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[HEADSUP] change to UsecaseAuthorizer interface and implementation

hi! please note that the usecase authorizer and implementation have been cleaned up. i'd appreciate your reviews and criticism of revision 562850. (yeah, i know, we're going into rc freeze, but then the changes are pretty local and the current situation was Ugly(TM), with an externally visibl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42994] - workflow.xml should be moved into the core

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: why ac *and* acusecases module?

Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb: > hi! > > > while trying out some approaches to attack > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42952, i found out > that we currently have two ac-related modules in src/modules-core: > "ac" and "acusecases". > > what is the intention of this? are there iss

why ac *and* acusecases module?

hi! while trying out some approaches to attack http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42952, i found out that we currently have two ac-related modules in src/modules-core: "ac" and "acusecases". what is the intention of this? are there issues with circular dependencies? regardles