https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
Richard Frovarp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 11/22/2010 04:08 PM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
3) https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
This may be non-issue (a user error), but since it is reported to show up during
installation on Windows, we should adress it.
No, it was missing for some reason in 2.0.3. It is in 2.1.x
Hi Florent,
> As your pathes are "fresh" can you also commit them into the 2.1.x
> branch in order to keep it sync with your tiny improvements and bug fixes ?
yes, as soon as we are confident that they work correctly.
> Do you think that 2.0.x is ready to a release or you see another thinks
On 11/22/2010 03:53 AM, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Hi Lenya devs,
I suggest that we simplify the mod_proxy_ajp setup in our documentation
[1]:
* Don't strip publication ID in authoring environment => only one
* Provide authoring access only via SSL
WDYT?
-- Andreas
[1] http://lenya.apache.org
Who can do the more, can do the less (a bad translation of a french idiom).
Keep somewhere this advanced configuration is a good thing imo. It could
be useful in many case.
But a more simple and easy to understand configuration is nice too.
What about split it into 2 paragraph, ie "simple config
Hi Lenya devs,
I suggest that we simplify the mod_proxy_ajp setup in our documentation [1]:
* Don't strip publication ID in authoring environment => only one
* Provide authoring access only via SSL
WDYT?
-- Andreas
[1] http://lenya.apache.org/docu20/tutorials/proxy/modproxyajp.html
--
Andr
Thanks for this Rainer !
As your pathes are "fresh" can you also commit them into the 2.1.x
branch in order to keep it sync with your tiny improvements and bug fixes ?
Do you think that 2.0.x is ready to a release or you see another thinks
to to before ?
Have a good day,
++
On 11/21/2010 03:32
