Ok, thanks for this lights !
On 11/24/2010 05:16 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 04:04 AM, florent andré wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm +1 with your proposal.
>>
>> I'm not very aware of legal issues, but IMO put tiny module outside of
>> lenya svn sucks. Tiny is a very good value for Lenya.
>
On 11/24/2010 04:04 AM, florent andré wrote:
Hi,
I'm +1 with your proposal.
I'm not very aware of legal issues, but IMO put tiny module outside of
lenya svn sucks. Tiny is a very good value for Lenya.
About automatic download, there is not something that change with the
large Maven adoption ?
On 11/24/2010 12:22 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
Maybe, but see this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox/%3cc5e63255050802170438fce...@mail.gmail.com%3e
and possibly a lot of other messages in this thread. So, as I understand
it, this is a policy issue rather t
Dear wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page "Lenya Wiki" for change notification.
The page JcrIntegrationApproach has been reverted to revision 7 by
RichardFrovarp.
The comment on this change is: Removing spam.
http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/JcrIntegrationApproach?action=diff&rev1=8&rev2=9
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Lenya Wiki" for change
notification.
The "JcrIntegrationApproach" page has been changed by JustineSmith.
http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/JcrIntegrationApproach?action=diff&rev1=7&rev2=8
Am 24.11.10 07:22, schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
Anyway, here is a modified proposal:
1. Add an automatic unpack step for Tinymce to the build prcess. I.e. if
the tinymce.zip files are there, it unpacks them during build.
2. Add the TinyMCE module to the default distribution, with the TinyMCE
menu en
On 11/23/2010 09:05 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 12:55 PM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> getting webdav right is tricky indeed. With the current
>> implementation, a delete
>> command on an entry in a webdav collection (i.e. on a language version
>> of a
>> document) deletes
Hi,
I'm +1 with your proposal.
I'm not very aware of legal issues, but IMO put tiny module outside of
lenya svn sucks. Tiny is a very good value for Lenya.
About automatic download, there is not something that change with the
large Maven adoption ?
With Maven, many dependencies outside of Apache
