Ok, thanks for this lights !
On 11/24/2010 05:16 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 04:04 AM, florent andré wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm +1 with your proposal.
>>
>> I'm not very aware of legal issues, but IMO put tiny module outside of
>> lenya svn sucks. Tiny is a very good value for Lenya.
>
On 11/24/2010 04:04 AM, florent andré wrote:
Hi,
I'm +1 with your proposal.
I'm not very aware of legal issues, but IMO put tiny module outside of
lenya svn sucks. Tiny is a very good value for Lenya.
About automatic download, there is not something that change with the
large Maven adoption ?
On 11/24/2010 12:22 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
Maybe, but see this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox/%3cc5e63255050802170438fce...@mail.gmail.com%3e
and possibly a lot of other messages in this thread. So, as I understand
it, this is a policy issue rather t
Am 24.11.10 07:22, schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
Anyway, here is a modified proposal:
1. Add an automatic unpack step for Tinymce to the build prcess. I.e. if
the tinymce.zip files are there, it unpacks them during build.
2. Add the TinyMCE module to the default distribution, with the TinyMCE
menu en
Hi,
I'm +1 with your proposal.
I'm not very aware of legal issues, but IMO put tiny module outside of
lenya svn sucks. Tiny is a very good value for Lenya.
About automatic download, there is not something that change with the
large Maven adoption ?
With Maven, many dependencies outside of Apache
Rainer Schöpf schrieb am 24.11.2010 07:22:58:
> Anyway, here is a modified proposal:
>
> 1. Add an automatic unpack step for Tinymce to the build prcess. I.e. if
the
> tinymce.zip files are there, it unpacks them during build.
>
> 2. Add the TinyMCE module to the default distribution, with the T
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 at 14:04 -0600, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 01:09 PM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> > With a few extra touches, the TinyMCE integration is ready to go.
> >
> > 1. Can we add an automatic download and unpack of TinyMCE to the build
> > process, so that people need only un
On 11/23/2010 01:09 PM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
With a few extra touches, the TinyMCE integration is ready to go.
1. Can we add an automatic download and unpack of TinyMCE to the build
process, so that people need only uncomment a line in
local.build.properties. As an additional goody, another buil
Hi Florent,
> I remember that you ask me to test some others patch. Can you commit
> them and then I try it ? Will be more simple IMO, and we can revert if
> something goes wrong.
I comiited the changes for the unloadhandler and simpleborwser plugins to the
2.1 branch.
Could you please check
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
> Good morning
>
> Am 04.11.2010 um 20:55 schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm wondering how much effort should be put into maintaining the TinyMCE
> 2.x integration.
> >
> > I propose to
> >
> > 1. support only TinyMCE 3.x f
ha, ok.
No problem for me with the (a). Moreover this will limit side effects IMO.
We just have to put a clear warning somewhere.
++
On 11/05/2010 11:28 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Hi Florent,
>
> > I'm big +1 with your proposal Rainer.
> >
> > Just to be clear - and to allow Jurgen to updat
Hi Florent,
> I'm big +1 with your proposal Rainer.
>
> Just to be clear - and to allow Jurgen to update his browser :) - Lenya
> 2.0.X support tiny 2.x AND 3.x right ?
At the moment, it supports tiny 2.x. Not all 3.x patches are committed (yet).
The options for lenya 2.0.X are:
(a) change
Hi,
I'm big +1 with your proposal Rainer.
Just to be clear - and to allow Jurgen to update his browser :) - Lenya
2.0.X support tiny 2.x AND 3.x right ?
I remember that you ask me to test some others patch. Can you commit
them and then I try it ? Will be more simple IMO, and we can revert if
som
Good morning
Am 04.11.2010 um 20:55 schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm wondering how much effort should be put into maintaining the TinyMCE 2.x
> integration.
>
> I propose to
>
> 1. support only TinyMCE 3.x from lenya 2.1.X on,
>
> 2. continue to support TinyMCE 2.x for lenya 2.0
Ok. Will try it today. Keep you in touch.
++
On 10/26/2010 09:02 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Hello Florent,
>
> I tested these patches with Tiny3, but they _should_ work wiht Tiny2 as well.
> The idea is to have support for Tiny2 and Tiny3 in the 2.0 branch, so that
> people can install a new 2
Hello Florent,
I tested these patches with Tiny3, but they _should_ work wiht Tiny2 as well.
The idea is to have support for Tiny2 and Tiny3 in the 2.0 branch, so that
people can install a new 2.0 version without changing from tiny2 to tiny3.
I plan to put together all my patches soon, but I ha
Hi Rainer,
I try this with tiny3 or tiny2 ?
IMO for the 2.1 branch we can just focus on the tiny3.
Cheers
On 10/24/2010 06:14 PM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Hi Florent,
>
> changes committed. Can you please try the patches in
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26178
>
> f
Hi Florent,
changes committed. Can you please try the patches in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26178
for the unloadhandler and simplebrowser plugins?
Thanks
Rainer
-
> Hi Ra
Hi Rainer
Works like a charm. great ! This is why I have the ""bug"". Nice way to
limit this.
The svn wait him ! :)
Can you please commit it in 2.0 and 2.1 branch ? (still we don't have
decide to release and stop 2.0.)
Thanks !
On 10/21/2010 10:29 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Hi Florent,
>
> co
Yes sure !
I don't think have enough time today, but tomorrow could be fine.
Thanks for this Rainer.
On 10/21/2010 10:29 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> Hi Florent,
>
> could you please try the appended patch?
>
> Rainer
>
> __
>
Hi Florent,
could you please try the appended patch?
Rainer
__
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, florent andré wrote:
> no messages in logs
>
> Documents are "checked in" when I try to modify.
> The tiny editor open well, I can do
no messages in logs
Documents are "checked in" when I try to modify.
The tiny editor open well, I can do text modification, and when I clic
on save the message appear on top of the editor.
Click on "cancel" do nothing, document is still open.
I have to clic on another doc to escape from t
Hello Florent,
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Sorry, I don't know this tutorial page.
>
> Just try it on the 2_0_X branch, and I still have this message when I try to
> save the document (test on imported documents) :
>
> Usecase messages for "tinymce.edit":
>
> * Involved objects are checked
Hi Rainer,
Sorry, I don't know this tutorial page.
Just try it on the 2_0_X branch, and I still have this message when I
try to save the document (test on imported documents) :
Usecase messages for "tinymce.edit":
* Involved objects are checked out.
I can edit the same page with others
Hi Florent
> Hi Rainer, Hi there
>
> In order to try your patch I begin the installation of TinyMCE.
>
> And it's not so easy for an editor newbie like me ! :)
>
> So, be carefull... long mail comes ! :)
>
>
> == Download of tiny "core" ==
>
> *** Fix the version ***
>
> In or
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:17:08 +0200, Andreas Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 21.07.10 07:51, schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 15:33 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>>
>> > On 07/20/2010 11:18 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
>> > > I'd like to collect the bits and pieces missing for better
>> >
Am 21.07.10 07:51, schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 15:33 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 11:18 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> > I'd like to collect the bits and pieces missing for better TinyMCE
> > integration.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > 3. Better dis
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 15:33 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 11:18 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> > I'd like to collect the bits and pieces missing for better TinyMCE
> > integration.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > 3. Better display of TinyMCE editor page, without e.g., menus and
> > bre
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 15:33 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 11:18 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
> > I'd like to collect the bits and pieces missing for better TinyMCE
> > integration.
> >
> > Here is what I have:
> >
> > 1. TinyMCE 3.x
> >
> > Lenya 2.3 Works with the current
On 07/20/2010 11:18 AM, Rainer Schöpf wrote:
I'd like to collect the bits and pieces missing for better TinyMCE
integration.
Here is what I have:
1. TinyMCE 3.x
Lenya 2.3 Works with the current version 3.3.8. Check.
Excellent
2. rng schema: Change TinyMCE dialogs to only offer attributes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/07, Jörn Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
while you're on the soapbox anyway, could you elaborate on how you are
going to merge (or avoid or whatever) simultaneous edits?
I expect the design will mature.
The first (current) version journals -- every
On 10/11/07, Jörn Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, Jürgen Ragaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The topic of this thread was preventing editors from easily and
> > frequently leaving documents locked. Removing locks eliminates that
> > issue.
> w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/7/07, Jürgen Ragaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The topic of this thread was preventing editors from easily and
frequently leaving documents locked. Removing locks eliminates that
issue.
while you're on the soapbox anyway, could you elaborate on how you are
goin
Am Oct 6, 2007 um 13:59 schrieb Jürgen Ragaller:
Hi
From our last weeks editor teaching event we received two feedbacks
regarding tinyMCE:
1) If a user navigates away, the page remains locked and changes
made in tinymce are lost - this leads to frequent use of force
checkin...
2) the
On 10/7/07, Jürgen Ragaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Oct 7, 2007 um 1:22 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > The 1.3 specifications include no locks. Globally distributed
> > applications cannot have any locking. Two people edit on one server,
> > another is editing on another server, and a thi
Hi, solprovider
thanks for the feedback
Am Oct 7, 2007 um 1:22 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dialog boxes are not safe workflow. Browsers and computers still
crash accidentally and deliberately. Somebody will bypass any
interface-based process.
Point taken - but I think at the moment the java
Dialog boxes are not safe workflow. Browsers and computers still
crash accidentally and deliberately. Somebody will bypass any
interface-based process.
The 1.3 specifications include no locks. Globally distributed
applications cannot have any locking. Two people edit on one server,
another is
Good evening, Jörn
Am Oct 6, 2007 um 21:33 schrieb Joern Nettingsmeier:
hi jürgen!
Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
Hi
From our last weeks editor teaching event we received two
feedbacks regarding tinyMCE:
1) If a user navigates away, the page remains locked and changes
made in tinymce are lost -
hi jürgen!
Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
Hi
From our last weeks editor teaching event we received two feedbacks
regarding tinyMCE:
1) If a user navigates away, the page remains locked and changes made in
tinymce are lost - this leads to frequent use of force checkin...
2) the german name of the
Am Oct 6, 2007 um 13:59 schrieb Jürgen Ragaller:
Hi
From our last weeks editor teaching event we received two feedbacks
regarding tinyMCE:
1) If a user navigates away, the page remains locked and changes
made in tinymce are lost - this leads to frequent use of force
checkin...
2) the
Doug Chestnut wrote:
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
simon litwan wrote:
to collaborate on this module we could provide space on wyona svn repo
until the lenya community would like to include this module in the
lenya
repo.
WDYT joern?
sure, we can do that. but since it's non-intrusive except
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
simon litwan wrote:
to collaborate on this module we could provide space on wyona svn repo
until the lenya community would like to include this module in the lenya
repo.
WDYT joern?
sure, we can do that. but since it's non-intrusive except for the
usecase view pa
simon litwan wrote:
>>> to collaborate on this module we could provide space on wyona svn repo
>>> until the lenya community would like to include this module in the lenya
>>> repo.
>>>
>>> WDYT joern?
>> sure, we can do that. but since it's non-intrusive except for the
>> usecase view patch, we co
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 11:56 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> simon litwan wrote:
> > On Don, 2006-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> > i fixed this issue, just replaced
> >
> >
>
> ah, sorry. my test setup runs in the root context...
>
> > to collaborate on this module we c
simon litwan wrote:
> On Don, 2006-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> i fixed this issue, just replaced
>
>
ah, sorry. my test setup runs in the root context...
> to collaborate on this module we could provide space on wyona svn repo
> until the lenya community would like to i
On Don, 2006-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> simon litwan wrote:
> > On Son, 2006-09-10 at 00:47 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> >> hi everyone!
> >>
> >>
> >> here's a first pre-alpha version of a tinymce module:
> >>
> >> http://pol-serv1.politik.uni-duisburg-essen.de/~netti
simon litwan wrote:
> On Son, 2006-09-10 at 00:47 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>> hi everyone!
>>
>>
>> here's a first pre-alpha version of a tinymce module:
>>
>> http://pol-serv1.politik.uni-duisburg-essen.de/~nettings/tinymce.tar.bz2
>
> i tried your tinymce intergation.
> unfortunatly it
On Son, 2006-09-10 at 00:47 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> hi everyone!
>
>
> here's a first pre-alpha version of a tinymce module:
>
> http://pol-serv1.politik.uni-duisburg-essen.de/~nettings/tinymce.tar.bz2
>
> it's almost a complete rewrite loosely inspired by the wyona module. it
> doe
Joern,
We started a module at Wyona, you can find it here:
http://svn.wyona.com/repos/public/lenya/modules/tinymce/
I haven't tried in a long time, and it was rather a proof of concept,
but you should give it a try.
If you are interested in working on tinymce, we could give you svn
access to
49 matches
Mail list logo
