Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb:
i'm thinking of committing the attached patch, which will make
and optional, but forces them to have at least
one resource or module element inside.
andreas, since you changed that code: is there a particular reason for
the current behaviour
Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb:
> i'm thinking of committing the attached patch, which will make
> and optional, but forces them to have at least
> one resource or module element inside.
>
> andreas, since you changed that code: is there a particular reason for
> the current behaviour, i.e. mandate t
i'm thinking of committing the attached patch, which will make
and optional, but forces them to have at least
one resource or module element inside.
andreas, since you changed that code: is there a particular reason for
the current behaviour, i.e. mandate the wrappers and make the content
e
