Thanks Lee! Yes, after sending this out, I'd pretty much settled on #1. I
figured a PR was the best way to have a more active discussion anyway. :)
On Wed Nov 26 2014 at 9:21:08 AM Lee Verberne wrote:
> This has come up for me as well in adding support for targetHttpProxies. I
> like option 1 a
This has come up for me as well in adding support for targetHttpProxies. I
like option 1 as well. Option 2 would mean adding a third None-defaulted
parameter for targethttpproxy. Option 3 seems crufty.
On Wed Nov 19 2014 at 6:39:48 AM Eric Johnson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm working on the GCE d
