Not a big deal, but thanks for looking into it Tomaz.

On Sun Dec 14 2014 at 6:43:45 AM Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org> wrote:

> I just had a look and it seems like projects still can't use a custom field
> configuration.
>
> I will open INFRA ticket and ask them if it's possible to change that or if
> they can create a new field configuration for our project.
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > Yeah I've also been using labels for that. I think adding a new
> (optional)
> > provider / driver field is reasonable though
> >
> > I will have a look at adding a new field for that - last time I had a
> look
> > (over a year ago) it was locked and projects couldn't use custom fields,
> > but this might have changed since then.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Eric Johnson <erjoh...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to have a better way of triaging / finding Jira issues. What do
> >> you think about introducing a "provider" custom field and surfacing that
> >> in
> >> the "New/Edit Issue" flow?
> >>
> >> For now and I"m trying to use "Lables", but it's not part of the
> >> create/edit flow. I've bulk-edited the GCE issues and created a filter,
> >>
> >> project = LIBCLOUD AND resolution = Unresolved AND (labels = google OR
> >> summary ~ gce OR summary ~ google) ORDER BY priority DESC
> >>
> >> But I don't seem to be able to make that public.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Eric
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to