Thanks, vote is now closed. Proceeding with release of .20.0
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:34 AM, anthony shaw <anthony.p.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Please can everyone cast their vote today or tomorrow on the release of > .20.0 as communicated in the prior email. > > Thanks, > Anthony > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 7:03 PM, anthony shaw <anthony.p.s...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 for moving to 1.0.0. I was chuckling yesterday that Putty is still >> v0.69. >> >> Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:14 PM -0800, "Tomaz Muraus" <to...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >>> wrote: >>> >>> > > >>> > > I'd like to propose keeping the tag as is and moving this into the next >>> > > release as a minor (0.21.0) >>> > >>> >>> I proposed to use 0.21.0 instead of 0.20.0 since the enum int to string >>> change is backward incompatible in some scenarios. >>> >>> On a related note - we should really just pull the switch and call one of >>> the next releases 1.0.0. Then we can better follow semantic versioning :) >>> >>> >
