[dev] [VOTE] Development options for container support

2015-12-16 Thread anthony shaw
Hi, A recent pull-request has raised the question of what to do with containers, specifically rkt and docker. This PR proposes docker as a compute node driver, https://github.com/apache/libcloud/pull/654 As you can see, the implementation doesn't line up perfectly with the node driver, which was

[dev] [ANNOUNCE] Apache libcloud 0.20.0 release

2015-12-16 Thread anthony shaw
Libcloud is a Python library that abstracts away the differences among multiple cloud provider APIs. It allows users to manage cloud services (servers, storage, loadbalancers, DNS) offered by many different providers through a single, unified and easy to use API. We are pleased to announce the rel

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread anthony shaw
To summarize the vote. +1's Eric Johnson (binding) Tomaz Muraus (binding) Allard Hoeve (binding) Anthony Shaw (binding) 0: / -1s: / This closes the vote to move ahead with release 0.20.0 On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Tomaz Muraus wrote: > I assume you started a new voting thread because t

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread Tomaz Muraus
I assume you started a new voting thread because the previous one didn't have [VOTE] prefix in the title? This wouldn't really be necessary, just summarizing the results would be. In any case, we are where we are now and my vote stands. Please also explicitly call what is going on because a lot o

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread anthony shaw
To be clear, this is a continuation of the voting thread posted last week, there was a mistake in that the original vote thread did not contain the [VOTE] message in the subject. To keep with protocol, this voting thread is to clarify the record of votes Votes cast before were: [+1] Eric Johnson

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread anthony shaw
[+1] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0 On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Allard Hoeve wrote: > [+1] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0 >

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread Allard Hoeve
[+1] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

[dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread anthony shaw
This is a voting thread for Libcloud 0.20.0. This release contains numerous new features, improvements and bug fixes. The full change log can be found at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=libcloud.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES.rst;h=c70933e593d48e158dd429fcf27f6ee01009d0d8;hb=4087f45504f7c3bbd0f389

Re: [dev] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread Tomaz Muraus
Sebastien, Yeah, thanks for pointing this out here (I just let him know the same thing on chat) :) I believe ASF has or had some tooling which parses mailing list for voting threads and results and that's also one of the reasons why it's a good idea to use the prefix. As far as number of binding

Re: [dev] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.0

2015-12-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Anthony, I did not realize this at first, but it’s good practice to have the vote thread prefixed with [VOTE] Then do a [RESULTS] thread with the tally. Then do a tally at the end. Did we get 3 +1 (binding) votes ? if not we cannot release. > On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:51 AM, anthony shaw wrote: >